All categories

2 years ago

How do you simplify this

Mathematics

2 answers:

mestny [16]2 years ago

7 0

You ALWAYS remove parentheses first.

That gives you [ 1/4 a⁴ b⁻² ] in the denominator, and then
you can start dividing the numerator and denominator by
their common factors ("canceling").

snow_lady [41]2 years ago

6 0

I think the answer to that might be 1/2 or .5ab^3 because I multiplied the bottom part -2*-2 which is 4ab^4 then the top part is 2ab -3+2= 2ab^-1 then divide 2/4 and subtract -1-4 so it's = 1/2 or .5ab^3

You might be interested in

Classify the following triangle. Check all that apply.

klasskru [66]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a. scalene : Reason: all angles and sides are different measurements.

f. acute : all the three angles are acute (Less than 90)

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

1,200 and 11 and you will get 13,200

VLD [36.1K]

Answer:

That is true!

$1,200 * 11 = 13,200$

Let me know if you need more help with multiplication. I may be able to help.

Have a great day.

7 0

2 years ago

Hii please help i’ll give brainliest!!

Valentin [98]

Answer:

friction

lol you’re welcome

3 0

2 years ago

"assume that s is a non-empty set of real numbers which is bounded above and lambda is the least upper bound. Prove that for all

s2008m [1.1K]

By definition, if $\lambda$ is the least upper bound of the set $S$ , it means two thing:

$\forall x \in S,\ x \leq \lambda$
$\forall \varepsilon>0,\ \exists x \in S:\ x>\lambda-\varepsilon$

In other words, the least upper bound of a set is greater than or equal to every single element of the set, but it is "close enough" to the elements of the set, because you guaranteed to find elements in the set between $\lambda-\varepsilon$ and $\lambda$

For example, pick $S = [1,10)$ . Obvisouly, the least upper bound is $\lambda = 10$ . In fact, every number in $[1,10)$ is smaller than 10, but as soon as you take away something from 10, say 0.01, you get 9.99, and there are elements in $S$ greater than 9.99, say 9.9999.

So, the claim is basically proven by definition: if $\beta < \lambda$ , let $0 < \delta = \lambda - \beta$ . By definition, there exists $\alpha \in S:\ \alpha > \lambda - \delta$ .

8 0

3 years ago

A fair spinner has 9 equal sections: 3 red, 4 blue and 2 green. It is spun twice. What is the probability of getting not green t

mestny [16]

2 over 9 because if you see there are 3 red and 4 blue

4 0

2 years ago