Answer:
a. Traditional Income Statement
Sales ($125 x 140) $17,500
Cost of Sales ($60 x 140) <u>($8,400)</u>
Gross Profit $9,100
Salaries ($1,300)
Rent ($1,000)
Sales Commission ($17,500 x 5%) <u>($875) </u>
Net income <u>$5,925</u>
b. Contribution Margin Income Statement
Sales ($125 x 140) $17,500
Less: variable Costs
Cost of Sales ($60 x 140) ($8,400)
Sales Commission ($17,500 x 5%) <u>($875) </u>
Contribution Margin $8,225
Less: Fixed Costs
Salaries ($1,300)
Rent <u>($1,000)</u>
Net income <u>$5,925</u>
Explanation:
a.
Traditional Income statement calculates the gross profit after deducting the cost of goods sold from the revenue. After that it deduct all the operating expenses to calculate the Net Income.
b.
Contribution margin income statement consider all the variable expenses as cost of product cost and calculates the contribution margin, after that the fixed costs are deducted calculate the net income.
Answer:
Option 4 is definitely correct: Whether real GDP increased cannot be determined with the information given.
Explanation:
The information that is given only states that there has been an increase in the market value of final goods and services in two years. So, we cannot conclude that production increased in Rushya or average price levels increased there as per Option A and C respectively, because market value can be increased by both increase in production or price levels. Even Option B cannot be concluded as the real GDP is dependent on other variables as compared to the total market value.
Thus, only appropriate statement is option D: we cannot determine increase in real GDP with the given information.
Answer:
Anne Mullens committed embezzlement.
Explanation:
Embezzlement is defined as misappropriation of funds by someone with whom funds have been entrusted.
It is a theft as the money does not belong to the perpetrator. The perpetrator is only entrusted with funds.
One of the conditions for embezzlement is an existence of a fiduciary (trust) relationship between parties.
In the given case, Anne Mullens pocketed $57 cash from recorded amount instead of recording 57$ customer's payment via check. Instead she included the customer's check in the money to be taken to bank.
This is embezzlement of funds by Anne.
Help whit what business do you have
Answer:B. She is entitled to recover the damages if she can show that Roland agreed to pay such damages in his contract with her.
Explanation:
The non payment of the N500 installment by Roland constitute a breach of the sales contract, However an evidence of a commitment to be liable for additional cost that will be incurred will make it possible for Selina to recover the damages.
