Answer:
the warranty may have expired
Explanation:
- Warranty is not guaranteed. This is just a promise. It can be enforced if specified by the award for legal compensation for damages
- Warranty is a condition of the contract or the innocent word "does not go to the source of the contract" and only damages the innocent party
- Sometimes manufacturers allow you to purchase an extended warranty after your original warranty expires.
- If you do not have any warranty compared to the equipment installed by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM), it is difficult to confirm.
Answer:
time take = 13 months
so correct option is C.)13
Explanation:
given data
closing costs = $1,400
monthly payment reduce = $980 to $870
to find out
Time to cover cost
solution
we know here monthly payments after reduction will be
monthly payments = $980 - $870
monthly payments = $110
so
time taken is = 
.........1
time taken is = 
time take is = 12.727273
time take = 13 months
so correct option is C.)13
Option (b) for a response. In order to keep the expenditure multiplier from exceeding 1, output must increase while consumption must decrease.
<h3>Spending multiplier: What does it tell you?</h3>
An economic indicator of the impact that changes in government spending and investment have on a nation's Gross Domestic Product is the expenditure multiplier, often known as the fiscal multiplier.
<h3>When the multiplier is negative, what does that mean?</h3>
The negative multiplier effect happens when a spending leak or initial withdrawal from the circular flow has further impacts and a larger final decline in real GDP.
<h3>Why does multiplier exceed 1?</h3>
The rise in the national product indicates a rise in national income. Consumption demand rises as a result, and businesses produce to satisfy it. As a result, the increase in investment is greater than the increase in national income and product. There is a multiplier effect that exceeds one.
Learn more about expenditure multiplier: brainly.com/question/28140364
#SPJ4
Answer:
(a) (i) Define the term "Green Revolution" as used during the period 1945 to 1985.
- The use of modern agricultural techniques became widespread around many regions in the world. This led to higher yields through the use of fertilizers, pesticides, genetically modified seeds and mechanical machinery.
(ii) Explain the principal agricultural practices/technologies associated with the green revolution.
- extensive use of fertilizers, pesticides, genetically modified seeds and mechanical machinery.
(iii) Name TWO regions, in different parts of the world, where the green revolution has had a significant impact on crop yields.
- In North America, Mexican food production increased and they stopped importing food. Although currently that has reversed, and it is importing even more food than before.
- In Brazil, agricultural production increased dramatically. Both total farmed area and yields have continued to increase in the past years becoming a threat to the amazon basin.
(b) Identify and discuss TWO social, political, or cultural conditions necessary for the success of the agricultural practices/technologies of the green revolution.
- Emigration from rural areas to urban areas which resulted in a rapid expansion of urban centers. Since less labor was needed in farms, many people left rural areas due to lack of jobs.
- People started accepting genetically modified crops, which were not well accepted at first. A lot of money was invested in research and development of new seeds, fertilizers and pesticides.
(c) Identify and discuss TWO significant economic or ecological factors that may limit the long-term success of the agricultural practices/technologies of the green revolution.
- Many new agricultural techniques have resulted in a decrease of soil fertility. In many places crops cannot grow unless a lot of fertilizer is used.
- Countries were the green revolution was originally successful, like Mexico (where it started), have reduced the total area dedicated to crops. As the yields increased, the price of food started to decrease and many small farms could not keep operating.
Answer:
The level of saving = $450 billion - $400 billion= $50 billion
Marginal propensity to save = 1- marginal propensity to consume (MPC)=0.5
Expected consumption
MPC= change in Consumption/ change in income 200 billion * 0.5 = $100billion
Therefore consumption = 100 billion + 400 billion = $500 billion
Saving = $650 billion - $500 billion= $ 150 billion
Explanation:
