Answer:
Because slavery was what they're economy depended on.
Explanation:
During Lincoln's campaigns (and in the beginning of his presidency), Lincoln believed that slavery was unacceptable(it also went against his morals) and that it shouldn't expand. Many people and officials in the South took this as a threat and believed that he would turn against them and abolish slavery. If this happened the south's economy would go down.
I hope this answer helps you! Let me know if this was what you were looking for.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Pam is not violating the law of demand. The law of demand suggests that the supply of a product varies with demand. When demand increases, price increases, when demand decreases, price decreases. Notice that Pam has decreased hamburger consumption, meaning it has contributed to the decrease in demand. If the demand for hamburgers has decreased, it is only natural that the price of hamburgers will decrease. It should be noted that even if the hamburger price had risen and Pam no longer consumed hamburgers, the law of demand would still not be violated. This is because the law of demand takes into account aggregate demand (from all consumers) rather than individual demand. So Pam could have stopped eating hamburger as a matter of preference for another item.
Answer:
A <em>66 percent is sufficiently important to render the American Public universal</em>, but the argument should add the results of the poll immediately and focus on the opposing views.
Also expounding about why some of those 66% are in support of investing in renewable energy, it could be because they are concerned about the economy and not just about the atmosphere, or they live in an area that produces maize for bio-ethanol.
A poll shows only a piece of information, no matter how scientific it is.
3rd and 5th for sure, I don't know if there'd be more though.
