Answer: D. You should authorize the $10,000 expenditure to continue the project if the project will generate a positive net present value. The marginal cost-benefit analysis treats the $2.5 million as a cost that is irrelevant to the current decision making.
Explanation:
The options you presented were not all the options listed. The option I have listed as the answer is the correct option.
Under the Marginal Cost - Benefit analysis, only the Additional costs and inflows are considered. The original cost is considered a Sunk Cost and therefore irrelevant.
When making a decision therefore, the company or person should ask if the new investment will bring about a positive NPV. If it is not anticipated to, then there is no need to invest more into it.
I’m not understanding .. is there a picture ?
Answer:
If company uses weighted average method, then equivalent unit of direct material = Units completed + units in ending WIP
= 33,000 + 13,700
= 46,700 units
If company uses FIFO method, then equivalant unit of direct material = Unit started and completed + Units in ending WIP
= 33,000 - 11,200 + 13,700
= 35,500 units
Answer:
The answer is "Anna's broker"
Explanation:
The delegated monitoring would be a financial intermediary as it borrows from small investors and uses uncontrolled liabilities (deposits) (whose loans it monitors).
In opposition to individuals that monitor the buyer independently, it relates to delegating the job of watching with such a bank and therefore satisfies the description of delegated monitor from Anna broker parties.
