1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Reptile [31]
4 years ago
9

Stephanie runs a red light and crashes into a car driven by Britta, who was speeding. At trial, the jury finds Stephanie 80% at 

fault, and Britta 20% at fault. Britta’s total damages were $100,000, and the judge awards her $80,000. The judge was most likely applying the doctrine of:  Assumption of the risk.  Contributory negligence Comparative negligence  Implied consent 
Social Studies
2 answers:
kaheart [24]4 years ago
7 0

Answer

Comparative negligence.

Explanation:

The judge has applied the doctrine of comparative negligence in this trial.

Comparative negligence states that when an accident occurs, the fault and or negligence of each party involved is based upon their respective contributions to the accident. Insurers can use this to pay claims in order of assigned blame.

Comparative negligence is mostly used to assign blame in auto accidents. If two drivers both break the same traffic laws in an accident, as in the case of Stephanie and Britta. Many carriers assign blame each driver on a percentage basis, such as with Stephanie and Britta (80/20).

If two parties are involved in a car accident, the insurers use comparative negligence to assign fault. Determination of fault in an accident is a major aspect of insurance.

In this case the damages are awarded proportionally based on the degrees of determined negligence. Even though Britta is found less responsible, she still has a percentage of the blame assigned to her. The percentage of negligence attached to Britta, the less responsible party is called contributory negligence. In this trial resulting from a car accident the contributory negligence would be, Britta's failure to exercise responsibility over her safety. In this case, Stephanie could have used contributory negligence as a defense.

ser-zykov [4K]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Comparative negligence

Explanation:

comparative negligence is a principle of tort that states that when an accident occurs the negligence or fault of the accident is based on each party's contribution to the cause of the accident and therefore the compensation for damages is shared between these parties as exemplified in the question above.

Comparative negligence differs from contributory negligence by the fact that the plaintiff isn't settled under contributory negligence.

You might be interested in
A set of value based beliefs about the nature of people and the role of government is called
ira [324]
Ideology A comprehensive set<span> of </span>beliefs about the nature of people<span> and about the </span>role<span> of an institution or </span>government<span>. | Conservatism </span>A set<span> of beliefs that includes a limited </span>role<span> for the national </span>government<span>in helping individuals, support for traditional </span>values<span> and lifestyles, and a cautious response to change.</span>
5 0
4 years ago
What is a median outcome?
Pavlova-9 [17]
I don’t no but I think it’s 56
3 0
3 years ago
which of the following is an example of extrinsic motivation? group of answer choices a social worker spends more time with the
ololo11 [35]

Giving a student a reward is an example of extrinsic motivation.

<h3>Extrinsic motivation: what is it?</h3>

Extrinsic motivation refers to driving behavior with rewards or other incentives, such as adulation, fame, or money. It is driven by outside factors, unlike inner motivation, and might be less successful in long-term behavior change.

<h3>What are some examples of extrinsic motivation?</h3>

Extrinsic motivation is the term used to describe when someone feels compelled to do something in order to gain praise or avoid criticism.For instance, people might anticipate receiving cash, presents, or praise.

To know more about extrinsic motivation visit:

brainly.com/question/1658150

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
What year was NAFTA signed?
elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]
NAFTA was signed on 17th December 1992 by all three members (Mexico, US, Canada) in their respective capitals and it came to power on January 1, 1994.
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Most of which northern state bordering the Great Lakes is shaped like a mitten
Archy [21]
The stat is michigan
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The pilgrims came to the new world primarily for religious reasons; however, the signing of the mayflower compact showed that th
    14·1 answer
  • A challenge faced by researchers who want to see if wisdom increases with age is _____.
    7·2 answers
  • Characteristics of the u. s. economy is the role of the government.
    10·1 answer
  • Janet conducts a study on social loafing (letting other group members do most of the work). Similar to a prior research study sh
    14·1 answer
  • A researcher has a hypothesis there is a relationship between cancer and stress. He sets out to measure how stressed patients we
    9·1 answer
  • What four kinds of habit-forming drug use at the start of the 20th century caused social reactions leading to the passage of fed
    7·1 answer
  • A school administrator wants to get a sample of students to find out about students' opinions of the school mascot. She wants to
    12·1 answer
  • American Indians used the Cumberland Gap to
    6·2 answers
  • Who was the first Spaniard to explore the interior of Texas?
    9·1 answer
  • What does Blackwell mean by “In Marriage, the husband and wife are one person in law.”
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!