Step-by-step explanation:
Unfortunately you didn’t provide the expressions to chose from
however, we can write :
(5g+3h+4) •2 = 2*5g + 2*3h + 2*4 (using distributive property)
= 10g + 6h + 8.
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
For a two column proof, we want to start with the given information. From there, we will use various definitions, postulates, and theorems to fill in the rest.
Our two sets of given information are that Plane <em>M </em>bisects Line <em>AB </em>and that Line <em>PA</em> is congruent to Line <em>PB</em>.
We know from the definition of a bisector that it splits a line in two equal parts. Therefore, Line <em>AO</em> must be congruent to Line <em>BO</em>.
Now, we have two sides of a triangle that we have proved to be congruent to each other. From the image given in the original problem, we see that both triangles share Line <em>OP. </em>Line <em>OP</em> is congruent to Line <em>OP</em> through the reflexive property.
We now have proven that all three sides of the one triangle are congruent to the corresponding sides on the other triangle. Therefore, the triangles are congruent through the SSS theorem.
Answer:
Kayla
Step-by-step explanation:
Vertical lines are always undefined because if your answer has to be divided by zero, the answer is an undefined operation.
Horizontal lines always have the slope of zero!
Answer:
We print -> 21m + 25 ≤ 500
Print so good -> 18m + 44 ≤ 500
Maximum mats from We Print : the integer part of (500-25)/21 = 22
Maximum mats from Print So Good: the integer part of (500-45)/18 = 25
#Note
We take the integer part of the division because a mat cannot be in portions
Answered by GAUTHMATH