Answer:
Well, because it'll be very difficult to tell apart one object from another when one perceives there is an overlap between the two.
Explanation:
Let's remeber what Helmholtz said about perception, that it some times results from the assumptions we make about the enviroment without even being truely aware of it.
In this case, the umpire will have a really hard time judging wether it was "foul ball" or a "home run", given that his emotional status may pull him toward one call or the other.
Thankfuly, there are video-recording repetitions in baseball now.
The answer is peripheral route of persuasion in which an
individual most likely put consideration to his or her decision about a certain
information or product that he or she feels that it is something she or he can
be influenced with or attain because of the other party’s behavior that
affected him or her.
The correct answers are A) increased traffic in the in the neighborhood surrounding the Factory, and D) pollution from trucks making deliveries to the factory.
<em>The outcomes that are possible negative externalities are increased traffic in the in the neighborhood surrounding the Factory, and D) pollution from trucks making deliveries to the factory.
</em>
In economics, a negative externality is a cost that a third party suffers from an economic transaction. In this case, the first person is the CEO of the Company that plans to open a new fabric. He receives a benefit. The second person is the workers for the benefits of new jobs and continual education. The third person that is affected with the negative externalities is the people from the surrounding neighborhood, because the negative outcomes are going to be increased traffic in the in the neighborhood surrounding the Factory, and pollution from trucks making deliveries to the factory.
Explanation:
ya la respondiste amigo (a)
