All categories

3 years ago

What weakness did delegate at the constitutional convention see in the articles of confederation

Law

2 answers:

Scilla [17]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

i think its option 1

Explanation:

Butoxors [25]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

A weak central government

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was the first US Constitution that was replaced by the current Constitution. The Articles of Confederation were written before America went into the American Revolution War, it aimed to create a united country at the same time that the colonies remained independent.

The problem was that the Articles created a weak central government, that did not have many powers which caused the lack of united leadership since the country did not have a strong representative of other countries.

The Central government did not have the power to tax, so to have money the Central government should ask for loans of foreign governments or relay on the will of the states to give it money.

The Central government also was unable to gather a combined military force as a Union.

You might be interested in

Restaurant revitalization fund replenishment act of 2021.

olchik [2.2K]

The speaker of house of representatives

7 0

2 years ago

Play Coin Master with me! https://GetCoinMaster.com/2w6Ku

dsp73

Answer:

bet I will soon I'm finna be so good

4 0

3 years ago

Of the 4 purposes of the us criminal justice system is there one that seems nobler than the others?

zmey [24]

Answer:

accurate identification of the person responsible,

fair adjudication, is noble because it means that the judge looks at all the evidence and makes a non biased decision based only on evidence.

retribution,

deterrence,

rehabilitation and restoration is more noble because it keeps formal criminals from going back into crime and makes the country safer.

Explanation:

4 0

4 years ago

How much should intent matter in determining the seriousness of a crime? Should an attempted larceny carry a shorter sentence th

Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer:

its an murder to kill your mother

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Martina is arrested for a crime and refuses to take the witness stand at his or her trial.

Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

In Griffin v. California, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination not only allows a criminal defendant to refuse to take the witness stand during his trial, but it also bars the prosecutor from urging the jury to interpret that silence as an indication that the defendant has something to hide. The Court reasons that the right against self-incrimination would be meaningless if a defendant’s exercise of the right could be used against him.

Hope this helps

6 0

3 years ago