The common strategy for coping is to seek support and guidance from those around you.
Today, a majority of the world’s population<span> lives in cities</span>. By 2050, two-thirds of all people on the planet are projected to call urbanized areas their home. This trend will be most prominent in developing countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America: More than 90% of the global urban growth is taking place in these regions, adding 70 million new residents to urban areas every year.
For the many poor in developing countries, cities embody the hope for a better and more prosperous life. The inflow of poor rural residents into cities has created hubs of urban poverty. One-third of the urban population in developing countries<span> resides in slum conditions</span>. On the other hand, urban areas are engines of economic success. The 750 biggest cities on the planet account for 57% of today’s GDP, and this share is projected to rise further. It is thus unsurprising that rapid urban growth has been dubbed one of the biggest challenges by skeptics and one of the biggest opportunities by optimists.
One reason for this disagreement is that the relationship between economic development and urbanization is complex; causation runs in both directions. In the study “Growing through Cities in Developing Countries,” published in the World Bank Research Observer, Gilles Duranton from the University of Pennsylvania examines this relationship in depth. The strong positive correlation between the degree of urbanization of a country and its per-capita income has long been recognized. Still, the relationship between these two variables is only partially understood in the context of developing countries. In reviewing studies that focus on the impact of cities both in developed and developing countries, Duranton tries to identify the extent to which urbanization affects economic growth and development. (“Agglomeration” economies refers to physical clustering.
<u>Answer:</u>
Now and then depicted as a false analogy or a faulty analogy, the week analogy presents a defense by depending too vigorously on superfluous similitudes without recognizing that <em>two ideas, things, or circumstances might be very particular from each other in an increasingly applicable manner. </em>
False Dilemma is a fallacy <em>dependent on an either-or sort of contention.</em>
Two decisions are exhibited, when more may exist, and the case is made that one is false and one is valid or one is worthy and the other isn't. <em>A False analogy is an informal fallacy.</em>
Answer:
Niccolo Machiavelli.
Explanation:
He was an Italian diplomat, politician, and philosopher. He is most known because of his book called "The Prince". A book that analyzed different political systems. To him is granted the negative connotation that today has the words "politics" and "politician" along with the term Machiavelli.
In his book, he advises how to rule successfully but sometimes doing bad things on purpose.
I hope this answer helps you.
This could be Character (can also be trait or temperament) <span>
</span>
