It’s a as they believed that through anything they would get this land such as the trail of tears
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
The basic guideline in writing a title that is being considered when the researcher should not use any unfamiliar and hard to understand words to avoid confusion to the readers is that the research uses a comprehensive and clear title to prevent any confusion.
The title has to clearly express the purpose of the paper and be so interesting that people indeed want to read it. The researcher has to have in mind that the title should include the tone of the writing and it has to include keywords to facilitate the search if someone tries to look for the paper on the internet. It is as well as important to discard any useless word or jargon, slangs, and unnecessary ideas that are not well suited in the title.
Answer: The main reasons that so many more people died in Haiti (100,000+) than in Chile (523) is that the buildings in Haiti were not built to withstand earthquakes and therefore collapsed whereas buildings in Chile are built to a strict earthquake resistance code.
Explanation:
In this question, Greta, a mother of 3 children and the widower of Mr Robert, devising all her estate to a womanizer Gary Watson; which, by will of Robert, is to be transferred to the Children equally after the death of Greta. So Yes, children have absolutely the legal rights in invalidating Greta's will on the basis of their father's will in which he clearly told Greta to transfer the property to his children. Now from the legal and Ethical point of view, a mother should not be allowed to disinherit her offspring. The only people entitled to receive parent's property should be their children. And also Greta has developed the problem of being forgetful, the case for the children would be super easy to win, plus the reputation of the womanizer would also help children in winning the case.
