1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leni [432]
3 years ago
8

What are the chances that a coin toss will result in heads? (vs. tails)?

Mathematics
2 answers:
Alexus [3.1K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

50/50

Step-by-step explanation:

there are only two sides so they both get 50 percent

Ugo [173]3 years ago
4 0

Answer: 1 in 2 chance

Step-by-step explanation: because there are only 2 sides and can only land on one side

You might be interested in
Write the quadratic equation of the parabola that passes through (-2,5) and has a vertex of (1,-3)
guapka [62]
-8/3x - 1/3 is the equation
6 0
3 years ago
Help im being timed
Oksanka [162]

Answer:

he made the error in step 2

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is this plz help me
iren [92.7K]
20 is the answer for x
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Consider the following proposed proof by contradiction that for all positive integers n, 3n > 2.
laila [671]

Answer:

The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.

Step-by-step explanation:

The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.

This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.

A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.

To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."

7 0
3 years ago
Original amount: 27<br> End amount: 38.61<br><br> Increase or decrease
vichka [17]

Answer:

increase

Step-by-step explanation:

11.61 was added to 27

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • -10 * -10 ^ 4 evaluated expression​
    10·1 answer
  • The lengths of lumber a machine cuts are normally distributed with a mean of 106 inches and a standard deviation of 0.3 inch. ​(
    7·1 answer
  • A clothing sells 26 shirts and 22 pairs of jeans. Each item of clothing costs $32. What is a reasonable estimate for the total c
    5·2 answers
  • What is the answer -1/4-5/6
    13·1 answer
  • 80% of blank games is 32 games
    15·2 answers
  • Evaluate the expression for the given value of the variable. 8q + 6; q = 2
    12·2 answers
  • A fair coin is flipped twice. H is recorded for heads and T for tails after each flip. The notation for conditional probability
    13·1 answer
  • The circumference for a round pool that has a diameter of 16 feet would be?
    13·1 answer
  • Tìm tuần hoàn y = cos2x , y = sin2x
    6·1 answer
  • Assume that police estimate that 30% of drivers do not wear their seatbelts. They set up a safety roadblock, stopping cars
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!