The native Americans already had the first 3 items. The British brought horses to the new world and the native Americans used them a good bit Civil War and after.
Answer:
b. The statements are all positive and complimentary, which is what people want to hear.
Explanation:
The psychologists of early times mainly focused on the population of the "men" part. Great Greek psychologists of early times like Aristotle and Plato focused on men as they thought that women are of lesser important to the society. This criticism of giving importance to men only or focusing on men part of the psychology only was called as the Masculinity toxic psychology.
Option (b). is correct as people always want or prefer to hear what is positive and also good things about themselves, and they do not confuse it with narcissism.
Answer:
provide a release for Greek overpopulation, land hunger, and political unrest
gathered food and supplies find good farmland in a safe area
Explanation:
Answer:
2 year terms without restriction on consecutive terms
Explanation:
Question:
Why do you think Lincoln didn't end slavery in the north?
Answer:
The proclamation didn't end slavery because it didn't affect the border slave states that weren't in rebellion, and it had no immediate effect in most of the deep South because, at least on the day it was issued, the slaves were in territory still controlled by the Confederacy.
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count enslaved people for the purposes of representation in the federal government.
In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system.
Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed enslaved people should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and enslavers. Leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell,” and went so far as to burn a copy at a Massachusetts rally in 1854.
-Alan Becker
