Answer:
It would no longer be a polar molecule with a slightly positive and slightly negative ends. It then would not be able to dissolve ionic salts or polarized organic compounds such as sugar.
Explanation:
✿<em>I'll </em><em>take</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>5</em><em>0</em><em> </em><em>pts</em><em> </em>✿
<em>✨</em><em>Refer</em><em> </em><em>these</em><em> </em><em>attachments</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>for</em><em> </em><em>your</em><em> </em><em>answer</em><em> </em><em>✨</em>
<em>hope it helps</em> ❤~
✨luv, Snowflake✨
(1) False, lots of energy is actually produced from nuclear fuel, if we didn't get much then we probably wouldn't use it
(2) False, its burning coal that contributes to acid rain, since it contains sulfur
(3) False again, we can control the reaction with aptly named control rods, which are typically made of boron, to absorb some of the neutrons flying around in the chain reaction
(4) True, radioactive waste is very difficult to dispose of, and is also very dangerous. Sources of radiation can remain so for millions of years
They can use them to find the age of fossils.
