This should NOT be considered when setting a current budget
Future income
Explanation:
Future income can be anticipated but never factored in.
This is because the economy is not only controlled by economic policy or statistics that anticipate growth but outside influences too.
For example, despite the productive growth in the recent time there will be decrease in incomes throughout the world this year.
This is because of the recent crisis that was not foreseen at all.
Thus policy making must not see the future as anything granted and must only set up goals for the present and only anticipate what would probably come in the future.
I don't know the answer. I just want you to know that. Good day mate.
Answer:
$2.90 per unit
Explanation:
The computation of the cost per equivalent unit of conversion is attached below:-
The formulas are shown below:-
Equivalent material = Direct material × Percentage completion
Equivalent conversion = Conversion × Percentage completion
The cost per equivalent unit come from
= Total cost ÷ number of equivalent units
hence, the cost per equivalent unit of conversion is $2.90 per unit
Answer:
Assuming that the elimination of frequent-flyer programs would have enabled the airlines to earn higher profits and remain in business, then it would be a purely good idea for the airlines to eliminate their frequent-flyer programs.
The big question is, how much did the frequent-flyer programs cost the airlines? Would the cost-savings be sufficient to eliminate their bankruptcies? It is a known-fact that the airlines that create such programs always recover the program costs by charging higher fares.
Explanation:
The issue of airlines going bankruptcy does not seem to stem from customer-loyalty programs like the frequent-flyer programs. The root cause lies in operational and other costs that airline managements have not been able to control.
