Answer:
1. Andrew Carnegie
You probably recognize Andrew Carnegie’s name, since he’s one of the most famous and richest industrialists of all time. However, he didn’t accumulate his wealth as a result of formal education or a business-charged background. Instead, he dropped out of school at a young age and spent the major portion of his youth performing manual labor. He was a bobbin boy at a local cotton mill and then became a telegraph messenger. It wasn’t until he taught himself how to read and entered the railroad industry that he began to build the empire that would make him (and his family) a fortune.
2. John Paul DeJoria
You may not have heard of John Paul DeJoria, but you’ve certainly indulged in some of the beauty products attached to his name. Now a multi-billionaire and one of the most accomplished entrepreneurs in modern history, DeJoria got his start as a newspaper courier. To make ends meet, he worked as a tow truck driver and a janitor. Eventually, he found his way to working at a hair-care company, where he met his future partner, Paul Mitchell. With minimal experience and a $700 loan, the duo founded a company now known as John Paul Mitchell Systems. From there, DeJoria co-founded Patron Spirits and the House of Blues.
3. Harland Sanders
If someone asked you for a loan to start a restaurant, but had no formal culinary training or experience, would you make that loan? It seems crazy to think anyone could become a successful restauranteur without a background in the industry, but that’s exactly what Harlan “Colonel” Sanders was able to do. When he started his line of Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurants, the only experience he had was cooking for his siblings as a child and working at a number of odd jobs.
The most logical answer to me would be A, however I recommend you don’t go with my answer JUST YET because this is an educational guess. Take time to think about my answer. Sorry if it’s wrong
Answer:
The annualized return is 14.82%
Explanation:
The formula for annualized return is given as Annualized return = (1+ holding return)12/n - 1
Holding return is 8.4%
n is the holding period of 7 months
Annualized return =(1+0.084)^(12/7)-1
Annualized return =14.82%
It is wrong to simply calculate annualized return as 8,4%*12/7,which means one is taking the interest to annual interest by proportional method,as this gives 14.40%, in investment every basis point counts.
The difference between the two figures is 0.42% which could translate into millions depending on the amount invested as well as the duration of investment
Answer:C
Explanation: this quantity is allocatively inefficient because the marginal cost of producing the last lawnmower exceeds the marginal benefit to consumers.
Answer:
B. If the building could be sold, then the after-tax proceeds that would be generated by any such sale should be charged as a cost to any new project that would use it.
Explanation:
The proceeds from a potential sale are the opportunity cost of using the building for a given project instead of selling to a third party. Not including any cost will lead to project not recovering the entire capital used in it.
Is important to notice this is the after-tax proceeds from the sale of the building.
