It’s C divergence hope this helped!
Answer:
d. None of these
Explanation:
Probably the identical sequence found in both species<em> </em>is an<em> ultraconserved sequence. </em>
An <u>ultraconserved element</u> is a particular DNI sequence that remains exactly the same through evolution, with almost no modification, and that is shared by at least two completely different species.
These ultraconserved DNI portions seem to be highly essential for life. However, their function could not be determined yet. Most of them do not codify for proteins, but they could play a significant role in gene regulation.
It is suggested that these sequences are so significant for life that only a small change would compromise the organism´s aptitude.
I believe it’s lactic acid fermentation! hope this helps
Tamam öğretmenim ben bir şey var ama ben bir insan bir arar bir insan bir cevap verir misin bana ya o kadar
The null hypothesis here is "the insertion of the wild type MSH2 gene does NOT reduce the number of <em>C. neoformans </em>C3 and C6 cells". This hypothesis is not supported by Figure 2, thereby the alternative hypothesis is accepted.
In the scientific method, a null hypothesis is a plausible explanation that states that there is no statistically significant difference between a certain feature and/or variable of a particular population.
In this case, the null hypothesis indicates that there are no differences associated with the insertion of the wild-type MSH2 gene variant (i.e., the normal allele) in the growth rate of <em>C. neoformans</em> strains on a medium containing a toxic chemical (mutagenic agent).
Figure 2 does not support the null hypothesis because the growth of wild-type MSH2 gene inserted <em>C. neoformans</em> C3 and C6 strains is inhibited when they grow on a medium containing a toxic chemical, thereby this hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is accepted.
Learn more in:
brainly.com/question/4454077
