All categories

3 years ago

Which percent is equivalent to 2 and StartFraction 5 over 6 EndFraction?

Mathematics

2 answers:

marysya [2.9K]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

283%

Step-by-step explanation:

:))))

Nataly_w [17]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Which ever choice is 283% works.

Step-by-step explanation:

2 5/6= 2.83= 283%

You might be interested in

What would be the volume of a tree that has a radius of 2 feet and a length of 14 feet?

Blababa [14]

Answer:

C) 175.84 cubic feet

Step-by-step explanation:

V=πr^2h is the formula I used

I plugged in the numbers and solved

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Rick drove for 45 minutes on Wednesday for a distance of 34.5 miles. On Thursday, he increased his speed by 3 miles per hour, an

riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

is d and a

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

2 years ago

In a test of corrosion resistance, a sample of 62 Incoloy steel specimens were immersed in acidified brine for 4 hours, after wh

Dmitry [639]

Answer:

p-value = 0.0063

Step-by-step explanation:

PLEASE CHECK ATTACHMENT FOR COMPLETE SOLUTION AND STEP BY STEP EXPLANATION

7 0

2 years ago

Help idk how to do this

ki77a [65]

Answer:

√30

Step-by-step explanation:

We can find the value of x by using Euclidean theorem

x^2 = 3 × 10

if x^ = 30 then x = √30

3 0

2 years ago

The least-squares regression model y =−3.4+5.2x and correlation coefficient r=−0.66 were calculated for a set of bivariate data

Makovka662 [10]

Answer:

$r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}$

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

$r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356$

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we need to calculate the slope with the following formula:

$m=\frac{S_{xy}}{S_{xx}}$

Where:

$S_{xy}=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)(\sum_{i=1}^n y_i)}{n}$

$S_{xx}=\sum_{i=1}^n x^2_i -\frac{(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i)^2}{n}$

$\bar x= \frac{\sum x_i}{n}$

$\bar y= \frac{\sum y_i}{n}$

And we can find the intercept using this:

$b=\bar y -m \bar x$

And the model obtained for this case is:

$y = -3.4 +5.2 x$

The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.

And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:

$r=\frac{n(\sum xy)-(\sum x)(\sum y)}{\sqrt{[n\sum x^2 -(\sum x)^2][n\sum y^2 -(\sum y)^2]}}$

For this case the value of r = -0.66

Now we can calculate the determination coeffcient:

$r^2 = (-0.66)^2 = 0.4356$

And then we can conclude that 43.56% of the variation in y can be explained by the explanatory variable

And then 100-43.56 = 56.44 % of the variation in y that cannot be explained by the explanatory variable

8 0

2 years ago