Answer:
The reaction is not at equilibrium and reaction must run in forward direction.
Explanation:
At the given interval, concentration of NO = 
Concentration of 
= 
Concentration of NOBr = 
Reaction quotient,
, for this reaction = ![\frac{[NOBr]^{2}}{[NO]^{2}[Br_{2}]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%5BNOBr%5D%5E%7B2%7D%7D%7B%5BNO%5D%5E%7B2%7D%5BBr_%7B2%7D%5D%7D)
species inside third bracket represents concentrations at the given interval.
So, 
So, the reaction is not at equilibrium.
As 
therefore reaction must run in forward direction to increase and make it equal to 
.
The answer is the first one, Xe
<span>Explain the difference between a weak acid and a strong acid according to the Arrhenius theory his question in english</span>
Answer:
Yes, the investigations will reach similar conclusions about the reactivity of H2 and Cl2
Explanation:
1. The law of multiple proportions says that when elements form compounds, the proportions of the elements in those chemical compounds can be expressed in small whole number ratios. This means that regardless of whether 1000 times more of the products are used, the reactivity of the products is established by the chemical reaction
2. The law of multiple proportions is an extension of the law of definite composition, which states that compounds will consist of defined ratios of elements.
3. A reaction with more reactants will need more care because more products are produced, which can be toxic
4. H2 and Cl2 reactivity does not depend on the quantities but the chemical properties of each compound
A source of error is any factor that may affect the outcome of an experiment. There are countless conceivable sources of error in any experiment; you want to focus on the factors that matter most. Identify each source of error specifically and then explain how that source of error would have affected the results. Keep in mind that an "error" to a scientist does not mean "mistake"; it more closely means "uncertainty".
Many students are tempted to say "human error", but this term is vague and lazy; any decent teacher will not accept it. Instead, think about specific things that happened during the lab exercise where the end results may have been affected.
To give an example one might find in a bio lab: perhaps a water bath's temperature was not monitored very carefully and you found that an enzyme's activity was greater than you expected. In that case, you could write something like,
"The temperature of the water bath during this exercise was not monitored carefully. It is possible that it was warmer or cooler than intended, and this would have affected the enzyme activity accordingly. The fact that our enzyme activity was found to be higher than expected leads me to believe that perhaps the water bath was too warm."
