if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
<h3>
</h3><h3>
What is wrong with the graph?</h3>
When we graph over intervals like (a, b) or [a, b] or something like that, we use dots to define the end of the intervals, and to denote that the function ends abruptly or we have a jump.
In this case, you can see that between the end and the second part and the beginning of the third part there is a jump, so the use of dots is correct there, but if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
That is the only error with the graph.
If you want to learn more about piecewise functions:
brainly.com/question/3628123
#SPJ1
Answer:
both A and E
Step-by-step explanation:
because most of 70% of the water is sea salt and clean water comes from frozen underground.
Answer:
I tried solving it and didn't get same exact numbers but I got 8.67 million people so it might be answer choice B.
Answer:
4
3
0
Step-by-step explanation:
f(x) = y = -1/2 × sqrt(x+3)
2y = -sqrt(x+3)
4y² = x + 3
x = 4y² - 3
now renaming this, so that the normal symbols and names are used for this function definition, so that the input variable is called "x" :
f-1(x) = 4x² - 3
basically, just by itself, this function would be defined for all possible real values of x.
but because it is the inverse of the original function, which generates only values of y<=0, then for the inverse function that same range applies for its input variable x
x<=0
It would cost $7387.20 for the entire rectangular floor. Hope this answers your question. :)
