1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aev [14]
2 years ago
7

What is the coordination number for each of the following complexes or compounds? [Co(NH3)4(H2O)2]3+ [Cr(EDTA)]− [Pt(NH3)4]2+ Na

[Au(Cl)2]?
Chemistry
1 answer:
Burka [1]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

[Co(NH₃)₄(H₂O)₂]³⁺: coordination number = 6.

[Cr(EDTA)]⁻: coordination number = 6.

[Pt(NH₃)₄]²⁺: coordination number = 4.

Na[Au(Cl)₂]: coordination number = 2.

Explanation:

  • [Co(NH₃)₄(H₂O)₂]³⁺:

In this complex, Co is bonded with 4 molecules of NH₃ (with 4 coordinate bonds, one bond for each molecule) and 2 molecules of H₂O (with 2 coordinate bonds, one bond for each molecule) forming the complex with 6 coordinate bonds.

∴ coordination number = 6.

  • [Cr(EDTA)]⁻:

In this complex, Cr is bonded with 1 molecules of EDTA (with 6 coordinate bonds, 4 O atoms and 2 N atoms in EDTA molecule).

∴ coordination number = 6.

  • [Pt(NH₃)₄]²⁺:

In this complex, Pt is bonded with 4 molecules of NH₃ (with 4 coordinate bonds, one bond for each molecule).

coordination number = 4.

  • Na[Au(Cl)₂]:

In this complex, Au is bonded with 2 atoms of Cl (with 2 coordinate bonds, one bond for each atom).

coordination number = 2.

You might be interested in
What is the mass percent of potassium sulfate in solution if 78g of potassium sulfate is dissolved in 500 mL of water? (The dens
Debora [2.8K]

Answer:

13.5 %

Explanation:

First we<u> calculate the mass of 500 mL of water</u>, using <em>its density</em>:

  • Volume * Density = Mass
  • 500 mL * 1.00 g/mL = 500 g

Then we <u>calculate the mass percent of potassium sulfate</u>, using the formula:

Mass of Potassium Sulfate / Total Mass * 100%

  • 78 g / (78 + 500) g * 100 % = 13.5 %

6 0
2 years ago
Clouds form because water vapor in the air...
DIA [1.3K]
The answer is C. condenses
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Increased use of incineration is sometimes advocated as a safe way to dispose of chemical waste. But opponents of incineration p
pochemuha

Answer:

Option A is correct.

At the two incinerators at which leaks were reported, staff had had only cursory training on the proper procedures for incinerating chemical waste.

Explanation:

The main aim of the argument presented is to talk down the use of burning by incinerators method to dispose chemical waste. The argument presents great points in that there were 40 incidents at two existing commissioned incinerators in the last year where unexpected releases of dangerous chemical agents happened.

So, basically, the argument is all about how the high frequency of the unsuspected release of dangerous chemical agents should discourage this method of chemical waste disposal.

The argument then concluded that if more chemical waste are disposed using the burning by incinerator method, there will be more unsuspected release of dangerous chemicals.

We are then required to find the statement that most weakens the conclusion that there will be more toxic releases if more chemical waste are burned.

Analysing the Statements one by one

Statement A

This statement provides a possible reason for this high frequency of dangerous chemical releases. It states that the staff haven't been properly trained. So, this means that properly training the staff should most likely lead to lesser cases of toxic releases into the environment.

This is the statement that most weakens the conclusion.

Statement B

The conclusion wasn't about the incinerator method being the safest method. It was about whether increased incineration would lead to more toxic relaeses. So, this doesn't affect the conclusion.

Statement C

This statement says that incineration can be increased without building new incinerators by tapping into unused capacity at the old incinerators. Also doesn't affect rhe conclusion whether increased use of incineration will lead to more toxic leaks.

Statement D

This statement strengthens the argument; which is the opposite of what we're aiming to achieve.

Statement E

This statement hints that the toxic leaks do not have that much of a harmful effect because the toxic releases do not go beyond the property of the incinerator. This also doesnt tackle the conclusion about the frequency of leaks, it only addresses how not harmful the toxic leaks can be.

Hope this Helps!!!

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following methods can be used to completely separate a solution containing alcohol and water?
liq [111]
A) i think is the answerrrrr
8 0
3 years ago
Of the following: H2(g); He(g); CO2(g); which would behave least like an ideal gas? Why?
Margarita [4]
Answer:

CO2(g)

Because CO2 is the larges molecule with specific geometric, therefore it is not likely to behave as an ideal gas.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following contributes to nonpoint source pollution in water?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following atoms would gain two electrons to fill its valence energy level?
    12·2 answers
  • A + B-2C, ΔΗ1<br> 1/2A + 1/5B+ C, ΔΗ» =?
    10·1 answer
  • what happens when an object speeds up,slows down, or changes direction A) velocity B) time C) deceleration D) acceleration
    9·2 answers
  • What happens to the partial pressure of oxygen in a sample of air if the temperature is increased?
    7·2 answers
  • Someone, please help with Chemistry
    11·1 answer
  • An aqueous solution is 40.0% by mass silver nitrate, AgNO3, and has a density of 1.47 g/mL.
    15·1 answer
  • Where did the word "atom" come from?
    15·2 answers
  • Foxplain the term hybridizatim​
    5·1 answer
  • What happens at a convergent boundary?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!