Well, when an atom attains a stable valence electron, it means that the outer electrons are complete and so cannot attain any more electrons. For the first shell, it is complete when it has 2 electrons, the second shell is complete when it has 8 electrons, all the other shells also have a particular number when complete. Anyway, i believe the answer is HYDROGEN because when HYDROGEN combines with another atom of HYDROGEN, the outer shell is completed. This is because HYDROGEN has only 1 electron. If the two HYDROGENS, which both have 1 electron combine, they make the electrons 2, which is complete for the first shell, HYDROGEN ends in the first shell. Since the electrons become 2, the shell is at stable valence. In all the other options, this happens;
NEON- It has 10 electrons, 2 in the first shell and 8 in the second. So the the shells are already complete, so it can't bond with any thing, which is completely against the question.
RADON- Radon has 86 electrons.
HELIUM- Helium has 2 electrons, so the shell is already full, and cannot bond, so it goes against the question. The question says BY BONDING.
So the answer is definitely 4) HYDROGEN
Hope i helped. Have a nice day, by the way, i'm very sure it's hydrogen.
Tri-blade radiation symbol
Answer:
A compound can easily be split up into its different elements.
Explanation:
Lower as KCl has ionic bonding which is less stable than CaCl2s covalent bond which requires less energy.
Answer:
[O₃]= 8.84x10⁻⁷M
Explanation:
<u>The photodissociation of ozone by UV light is given by:</u>
O₃ + hν → O₂ + O (1)
<u>The first-order reaction of the equation (1) is:</u>
![rate = k [O_{3}] = - k \frac{\Delta [O_{3}]}{\Delta t}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20rate%20%3D%20k%20%5BO_%7B3%7D%5D%20%3D%20-%20k%20%5Cfrac%7B%5CDelta%20%5BO_%7B3%7D%5D%7D%7B%5CDelta%20t%7D%20)
(2)
<em>where k: is the rate constant and Δ[O₃]/Δt: is the variation in the ozone concentration with time, and the negative sign is by the decrease in the reactant concentration </em>
<u>We can get the following expression of the </u><u>first-order integrated law</u><u> of the reaction (1), by resolving the equation (2):</u>
![[O_{3}]_{t} = [O_{3}]_{0} \cdot e^{-kt}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5BO_%7B3%7D%5D_%7Bt%7D%20%3D%20%5BO_%7B3%7D%5D_%7B0%7D%20%5Ccdot%20e%5E%7B-kt%7D%20)
(3)
<em>where [O₃](t): is the ozone concentration in the elapsed time and [O₃]₀: is the initial ozone concentration</em>
We can calculate the initial ozone concentration using equation (3):
![[O_{3}]_{t} = 5.0 \cdot 10^{-3}M \cdot e^{-(1.0\cdot 10^{-5}s^{-1}) (\frac{10d \cdot 24h \cdot 3600 s}{1d \cdot 1h})} = 8.84 \cdot 10^{-7}M](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20%5BO_%7B3%7D%5D_%7Bt%7D%20%3D%205.0%20%5Ccdot%2010%5E%7B-3%7DM%20%5Ccdot%20e%5E%7B-%281.0%5Ccdot%2010%5E%7B-5%7Ds%5E%7B-1%7D%29%20%28%5Cfrac%7B10d%20%5Ccdot%2024h%20%5Ccdot%203600%20s%7D%7B1d%20%5Ccdot%201h%7D%29%7D%20%3D%208.84%20%5Ccdot%2010%5E%7B-7%7DM%20)
So, the ozone concentration after 10 days is 8.84x10⁻⁷M.
I hope it helps you!
