All categories

3 years ago

Help 15 pts. Please answer asap

Mathematics

2 answers:

Gnoma [55]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The answer is D.

Step-by-step explanation:

marta [7]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

D. $4\sqrt{a^{2}+b^{2}}$

Step-by-step explanation:

We can see the shape can be cut into 4 right triangles. We can use pythagoreans theorem to find the length of the hypotenuse.

The distance from 0 to a represents one side, and the distance from 0 to b represents the other side.

$a^{2} +b^{2} =C^{2}$

(C represents the hypotenuse)

So the hypotenuse can be written as $\sqrt{a^{2} +b^{2} }$

Since four of these lines make up the perimeter,

the total perimeter will be $4\sqrt{a^{2}+b^{2}}$

You might be interested in

-2x-6=10<br> Solve it because I don’t get it

solniwko [45]

Answer:

X = -8

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

3h = (2p – 1) + h<br><br> Please someone help

Natalka [10]

Are you solving p or h
This is the answer for h h=p-1/2
This is the answer for p p=h+1/2

4 0

3 years ago

-5(x+2)+3x= Which expression can be written in the box on the other side of the equation

storchak [24]

Answer:

O-2(x+5)

Step-by-step explanation:

I have to much time on my hands

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In his first year, a math teacher earned $32,000. Each successive year, he

Ivan

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Each successive year, he

earned a 5% raise. It means that the salary is increasing in geometric progression. The formula for determining the nth term of a geometric progression is expressed as

Tn = ar^(n - 1)

Where

a represents the first term of the sequence(amount earned in the first year).

r represents the common ratio.

n represents the number of terms(years).

From the information given,

a = $32,000

r = 1 + 5/100 = 1.05

n = 20 years

The amount earned in his 20th year, T20 is

T20 = 32000 × 1.05^(20 - 1)

T20 = 32000 × 1.05^(19)

T20 = $80862.4

To determine the his total

earnings over the 20-year period, we would apply the formula for determining the sum of n terms, Sn of a geometric sequence which is expressed as

Sn = (ar^n - 1)/(r - 1)

Therefore, the sum of the first 20 terms, S20 is

S20 = (32000 × 1.05^(20) - 1)/1.05 - 1

S20 = (32000 × 1.653)/0.05

S20 = $1057920

3 0

3 years ago

According to the US Bureau of labor statistics, 7% of US female workers between 16 and 24 years old are paid at the minimum wage

vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

The Null Hypothesis is $H_o:k_o = 0.07$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a :k_o \ne 0.07$

Decision rule

If the test staistics is greater than the critical value of significance level then $H_o$ is accepted else $H_o$ is rejected

With the above in mind

The critical value of the significance level which is obtained from the table is

$t_{0.05} = 1.645$

Now since the critical value of significance level is greater than the test staistics then the null hypothesis will be rejected

Conclusion

The information is not enough to back the claim that state differs from the nation

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The percentage of US female workers paid at the minimum wage or less is $k_o =$ 7% = 0.07

The sample size is $n = 500$

The number paid minimum wage or less is x = 42

The significance level is $\alpha =$ 5% = 0.05

Now the probability of getting a US female workers paid at the minimum wage or less is mathematically represented as

$\= k = \frac{x}{n}$

substituting value

$\= k = \frac{42}{500}$

$\= k = 0.084$

The Null Hypothesis is $H_o:k_o = 0.07$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a :k_o \ne 0.07$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically evaluated as

$z = \frac{\= k - k_o}{\sqrt{\frac{k_o(1-k_o)}{n} } }$

substituting value

$z = \frac{0.084 - 0.07}{\sqrt{\frac{0.07 (1-0.07)}{500} } }$

$z = 1.23$

Now the Decision rule is stated as

If the test staistics is greater than the critical value of significance level then $H_o$ is accepted else $H_o$ is rejected

With the above in mind

The critical value of the significance level which is obtained from the table is

$t_{0.05} = 1.645$

Now since the critical value of significance level is greater than the test staistics then the null hypothesis will be rejected

So the conclusion will be

The information is not enough to back the claim that state differs from the nation

4 0

3 years ago