Answer:
a. VRIN test, which asks if a resource is valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable.
Explanation:
Applying Barney's (1991) VRIN framework can determine if a resource is a source of competitive power. To serve as a basis for sustainable competitive advantage, resources must be:
valuable: meaning that they must be a source of greater value, in terms of relative costs and benefits, than similar resources in competing firms. When resources are able to bring value to the firm they can be a source of competitive power.
rare: rareness implies that the resource must be rare in the sense that it is scarce relative to demand for its use or what it produces. Resources have to deliver a unique strategy to provide a competitive advantage to the firm as compared to the competing firms. Consider the case where a resource is valuable but it exists in the competitor firms as well. Such a resource is not rare to provide competitive power.
inimitable: it is difficult to imitate. Resources can be sources of sustained competitive power if competing firms cannot obtain them. Consider the case where a resource is valuable and rare but the competing organizations can copy them easily. Such resources also cannot be sources of competitive power.
non-substitutable: other different types of resources cannot be functional substitutes. Resources should not be able to be replaced by any other strategically equivalent valuable resources. If two resources can be utilized separately to implement the same strategy then they are strategically equivalent. Such resources are substitutable and so are not sources of sustained competitive power.
The criteria of the VRIN Framework clearly rules out best practices as a source of competitive advantage. If other firms can easily understand and copy a capability, it is not a source of competitive power.
Answer:
a. It uses multiple work-in-process accounts for manufacturing firms.
Explanation:
"Companies use process cost systems to apply cost to similar products that are mass-produced in a continuous fashion.
[...] companies track costs through a series of connected manufacturing processes or departments, rather than by individual jobs. Thus, companies use process cost systems when they produce a large volume of relatively homogeneous products"
Reference: Weygandt, J. J., Kimmel, P. D., & Kieso, D. E. (2009). Managerial accounting: tools for business decision making. John Wiley & Sons. pp 100-101
Answer: A
Explanation:
The shareholder wealth maximization goal states that management should seek to maximize the present value of the expected future returns to the owners (that is, shareholders) of the firm. The longer it takes to receive a benefit, such as a cash dividend or price appreciation of the firm’s stock, the lower the value investors place on that benefit. Also, the greater the risk associated with receiving a future benefit, the lower the value investors place on that benefit. Since Asset A promises more benefits in the short run, it is better to choose option A.
The amount that should be debited to Bad Debts Expense, assuming 3% of outstanding accounts receivable at the end of the current year are estimated to be uncollectible is $1,913
<h3>What is bad debts expenses?</h3>
Bad debt are debts owned to a business which cannot be recovered. Here, the customer has chosen not to pay this amount.
Computation of amount to be debited to Bad Debts Expense:
= Accounts Receivable, debit balance of $97,800 * 3% of outstanding accounts receivable at the end of the current year
= $97,800 * 3%
= $2,934
Then,
= $2,934 - $1,021
= $1,913
Hence, the amount that should be debited to Bad Debts Expense, assuming 3% of outstanding accounts receivable at the end of the current year are estimated to be uncollectible is $1,913
Learn more about bad debts expenses here : brainly.com/question/18568784
