Competitive price taker firms always earn zero economic profit in long-run equilibrium because of the following reasons which include easy entry & exit, small player etc.
Perfect competition exists when there are many sellers, firms can easily enter and exit, products are identical from one seller to the next, and sellers are price takers.
A perfectly competitive firm must accept the equilibrium price at which it sells goods because it is a price taker.
A perfectly competitive firm will be unable to make any sales if it charges even a small amount more than the market price.
Furthermore, a perfectly competitive firm must be a very small player in the overall market, allowing it to increase or decrease output without affecting the overall quantity supplied and price in the market.
Hence, Competitive price taker firms always earn zero economic profit in long-run equilibrium.
Learn more about Long-run equilibrium:
brainly.com/question/6275304
#SPJ4
Answer:
Steve Jobs and he was the CEO of apple
Explanation:
so his products would be iphones, ipads, mac books, etc
Answer:
The range of possible transfer is $ 3.25 to $ 3.50
Explanation:
Data provided:
The purchasing cost of the transistor = $ 3.50
The total number of transistors needed = 8,000
The production cost of the transistor = $ 4.00
The included variable cost = $ 3.25
The included fixed cost = $ 0.75
Now,
the fixed cost cannot be altered, thus it will be there
hence,
the variable cost will be the factor that will evaluate the decision i.e $ 3.25
therefore, the <u>range of possible transfer is $ 3.25 to $ 3.50</u>
Answer: c. A bilateral contract
Explanation:
In a bilateral contract, the parties involved promise to both perform duties to the other which will make them both an obligor and an obligee.
An obligor is one who owes a duty to another and the obligee is one who a duty is owed to.
Aaron both owes a duty to sell the boat to Matt as well as being owed by Matt the duty to buy his boat. The same goes for Matt thus making this a bilateral contract.
Answer:
As a marketing executive of the company looking to beg an emergency leave from a HR person who is considered to be rudy, unfamiliar with me, 45+ age and also that the company is experiencing a lot of turnovers, the best way to approach the HR would be to:
1. Write an official letter to him making the intentions clear.
2. Politely ask him to consider your request even though you two are not very familiar with each other.
3. Stress the importance of the emergency and why you have to leave.
