(2,5) I think I’m sorry if I’m wrong:/
9514 1404 393
Answer:
- $9,000 at 15%
- $4,000 at 10%
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x represent the amount borrowed at 15%. Then the amount borrowed at 10% is (13000-x). The interest at the end of the year is ...
0.15(x) + 0.10(13000 -x) = 1750
0.05x = 1750 -1300 . . . . . . . . . . . . simplify, subtract 1300
x = 450(20) = 9000 . . . . . . . . . . multiply by 20
$9,000 was borrowed at 15%; $4,000 was borrowed at 10%.
So,
We are trying to find the compound probability of there BEING oil and the test predicting NO oil.
The percent chance of there actually being oil is 45%. We can convert this into fraction form and simplify it.
45% -->




That is the simplified fraction form.
The kit has an 80% accuracy rate. Since we are assuming that the land has oil, we need the probability that the kit predicts no oil.
The probability that the kit detects no oil will be the chance that the kit is not accurate, which is 20% (100 - 80 = 20). We can also convert this into fraction form and simplify it.
20% -->



That is the probability of the kit not being accurate (not predicting any oil).
To find the compound probability of there being oil and the kit not predicting any oil, we simply multiply both fractions together.



So the probability of there BEING oil and the kit predicting NO oil is 9 in 100 chances.
Answer:
lol okay
Step-by-step explanation:
absolutely you must choose 3 because only f(x)-1 is able to shift a graph down.
and in question of the left side 1 and 4 and 5 are correct!