Answer:
The major premise is lack of House to pay attention towards the road ahead of him and the rule of contributory negligence. By using this jurisdiction, the plaintiff's damages will be reduced.
Explanation:
- The defendant driver, while he may ultimately be liable if all of the witnesses say he ran the stop sign, will raise the comparative fault of House for failing to keep a proper lookout and failing to take evasive action to avoid a collision.
- The defenses are the same as they would be if the collision was with another car instead of a bicycle.
- House had an ordinary duty to pay attention to the road ahead of him and keep himself and others safe.
- By watching his books and not the traffic, he breached that duty.
- I'm not saying that defense will be successful, but that's what would be alleged by the car's driver as a defense.
- In most states, the damages to the plaintiff will be reduced by the percentage of his/her comparative fault (also known in some jurisdictions as contributory negligence).
- In some states, if the plaintiff's comparative fault is shown to be over 50%, there will be no recovery at all.
Answer:
The option that runs contrary to the classical theory of criminology is (A) Punishment should be certain
Explanation:
The key principle of Classical theory Of Criminology are
- <u>Rationality</u>:-This principle states that people commit crime at their own wish/will.
- <u>Hedonism</u>:The principle of hedoism states that people seek pleasure and minimize their pain by committing crime.
- <u>Punishment </u>:As per this principle punishment work as a deterrent to crime.
- <u>Human Right:</u>This principle states that the punishment given should not be harsh rather it should be swift.
The answer of the above question is (A) Punishments should be certain.
Answer:
- Talking about the conversation with a compliance officer of his firm
- Accept unsolicited trades from costumers in the company's stock
Explanation:
The agent listened to another company's employee talking on the phone about confidential information, that is, private information that the agent should not be listening to, but he has heard and can use it to his company's advantage. Since no one knows that the agent has this information, he can talk about the conversation he has heard with a compliance officer at his company, and he can accept unsolicited dealings from customers on the company's stock.
