The correct answer is Rights View of Ethics.
<u>Rights-based ethics</u> is a concept whereby all humans have rights based only on the fact that they are human. These rights are natural rights (moral ones) and conventional rights as created by the society in which that person lives in (different values). The opposite of rights based ethics are<u> utilitarian ethics</u>, which are based on the maximization of "good outcomes" and minimizations of "bad outcomes." An example of a rights-based ethics is: The right to freely practice a religion of choice; an example of an utilitarian ethics is: that it would be acceptable to torture someone to gain information to save others as it would have a positive net outcome.
Answer:
I think the answer would be trade winds
Answer:
<u>a. rule utilitarianism</u>
Explanation:
<u>Rule utilitarianism: </u>The term "rule utilitarianism" is described as one of the different forms of utilitarianism that determines a particular action is right as it conforming to a rule that tend to lead the "greatest good", or that the wrongness or rightness of a specific action is considered as a function of the "correctness" of the rule to which it is signified as an instance.
<u>In the question above, the given statement represents "rule utilitarianism".</u>
<span>In American politics, a "single-issue interest group" means an organization that is (or claims to be) devoted exclusively to advocating one particular position on one particular policy issue. An "organization" might be a non-profit or a non-governmental organization (NGO), or a labor union, or a trade association, or a concerned citizens' group. Single-issue groups usually claim to be non-partisan (i.e., they support initiatives regardless of whether Democrats or Republicans advance them).
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
</span>
Haley is experiencing "relative deprivation".
Relative deprivation is a term in Sociology that describes a social status conflict within a person's head. They feel like they have been deprived of something that someone else has and they make a social decision to try and get it. It's almost like the old slang term, "Keeping up with the Jones'".
