Answer:to recover the cost of defending the colonies
Explanation:
I believe the correct answer is: A. constructing an
anxiety hierarchy.
Constructing an anxiety hierarchy is
the first step of desensitization technique, which has for a purpose to teach
you to do something that is incompatible with the anxiety you feel in your
target situation (in Alfred’s case that is claustrophobia). Desensitization
technique has three steps:
1. Anxiety Hierarchy
2. Relaxation Training
3. Desensitization Sessions
Constructing anxiety hierarchy is a
step in which you construct a list of those situations involved in or leading
up to your target situation, in order
from the lease disturbing to the most disturbing for you.
It is false that Hesiod's theogony describes the destruction of the gods and the universe; this is how the world will end.
<h3>What is the point of view of
Hesiod's theogony?</h3>
Hesiod's theogony focus on the things that involves the birth, as well as the the "birth of the gods" and also the creation-time, and sees the gods as the the universe .
In this case, It is false that Hesiod's theogony describes the destruction of the gods and the universe; this is how the world will end.
Learn more on Hesiod's theogony at:
brainly.com/question/14673231
#SPJ1
The geographic feature that contributed to the begining of the farming communities was the low lying flood plains that had very rich and fertile soil. The flood plains got new soils every year after the flood water receded. These plains were highly fertile and helped in the growth of quality crops that could support the total settlement living nearby. Most civilizations were formed near the rivers to help farmers grow crops easily. The Indus Valley Civilization was formed beside the river Indus, while the Mesopotamian Civilization was found beside he rivers Tigris and Euphrates.
I believe the answer is: Does the speech pose a threat to the public <span>interest?
One example of such speech would be a speech that call for a destruction of other people's house. This type of speech could either make the target of speech feel unsafe/distress, or make other people actually persuaded to destroy the house. Since both of them are breaking the law, such speech is not protected under free speech.
</span>
