Answer:
The possible dimensions of the deck can be anything that adds up to be 130 m.
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>The perimeter could be 1m x 64m.</em>
Two sides would be 1m each (so 2m total) and the other two sides would be 64m each (128m total). 2 + 128 = 130m.
<em>The perimeter could be 15m x 50m.</em>
Two sides would be 15m each (so 30m total) and the other two sides would be 50m each (100m total). 30 + 100 = 130m.
Don’t mind my math homework- But ya the answer would be -1/3. You’re welcome I got your back :)
Step-by-step explanation:
the volume of a cube is
side³.
since the volume is 27 m³, the individual side lengths are then the cubic root of 27 = 3 m.
the surface area is 6 squares of 3×3 = 9m², so in total
9 × 6 = 54 m²
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
2(4 + x) = 34
4 + x = 34/2 = 17
x = 17 - 4 = 13
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
Use a rigid transformation to prove that angle NPO is congruent to angle NLM
=====================================================
Explanation:
The AA stands for "angle angle". So we need two pairs of angles to prove the triangles to be similar. The first pair of angles is the vertical angles ONP and MNL, which are congruent. Any pair of vertical angles are always congruent.
The second pair of angles could either be
- angle NOP = angle NML
- angle NPO = angle NLM
so we have a choice on which to pick. The pairing angle NOP = angle NML is not listed in the answer choices, but angle NPO = angle NLM is listed as choice B.
Saying angle NLM = angle LMN is not useful because those two angles are part of the same triangle. The two angles must be in separate triangles to be able to tie the triangles together.
We would use a rigid transformation to have angle NPO move to angle NLM, or vice versa through the use of a rotation and a translation.
