Step-by-step explanation:
here is the right answers
Answer:
The first one is incorrect
Step-by-step explanation:
I only looked at the first one, and it's incorrect, the higher the wind speed is, the more likely the wave is to grow in size and speed. I can answer the rest if you want, but I'm assuming you're probably finished already.
• 69/20
• 3 9/20
-I can’t see the last one but i’m pretty sure those are the only two
Answer:
4/3
Step-by-step explanation:
Given function = p(x) = (6x-4)/x
First we will calculate p(1) and p(3)
p(1) = (6(1) - 4)/1 = 6-4 = 2
p(3) = (6(3) - 4)/3 = (18-4)/3 = 14/3
Rate of change on interval [1,3] = [p(3) - p(1)]/(3-1)
=> (14/3 -2)/(2)
=> (14-6)/(3*2)
=> 8/6
=> 4/3
So average rate of change is 4/3
Answer:
Following are the response to the given points:
Step-by-step explanation:
For question 5.11:
For point a:
For all the particular circumstances, it was not an appropriate sampling strategy as each normal distribution acquired is at a minimum of 30(5) = 150 or 2.5 hours for a time. Its point is not absolutely fair if it exhibits any spike change for roughly 10 minutes.
For point b:
The problem would be that the process can transition to an in the state in less than half an hour and return to in the state. Thus, each subgroup is a biased selection of the whole element created over the last
hours. Another sampling approach is a group.
For question 5.12:
This production method creates 500 pieces each day. A sampling section is selected every half an hour, and the average of five dimensions can be seen in a
line graph when 5 parts were achieved.
This is not an appropriate sampling method if the assigned reason leads to a sluggish, prolonged uplift. The difficulty would be that gradual or longer upward drift in the procedure takes or less half an hour then returns to a controlled state. Suppose that a shift of both the detectable size will last hours
. An alternative type of analysis should be a random sample of five consecutive pieces created every
hour.