1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vampirchik [111]
3 years ago
15

Is 1/4 gallon less than, equal to, or greater than 1.1 qts?

Mathematics
1 answer:
Salsk061 [2.6K]3 years ago
4 0
It is less than because 1.1 is one full number and 1/4 is not
















You might be interested in
In the past decades there have been intensive antismoking campaigns sponsored by both federal and private agencies. In one study
astra-53 [7]

Answer:

C. z = 2.05

Step-by-step explanation:

We have to calculate the test statistic for a test for the diference between proportions.

The sample 1 (year 1995), of size n1=4276 has a proportion of p1=0.384.

p_1=X_1/n_1=1642/4276=0.384

The sample 2 (year 2010), of size n2=3908 has a proportion of p2=0.3621.

p_2=X_2/n_2=1415/3908=0.3621

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=0.0219.

p_d=p_1-p_2=0.384-0.3621=0.0219

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{1642+1415}{4276+3908}=\dfrac{3057}{8184}=0.3735

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.3735*0.6265}{4276}+\dfrac{0.3735*0.6265}{3908}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.00005+0.00006}=\sqrt{0.00011}=0.0107

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{0.0219-0}{0.0107}=\dfrac{0.0219}{0.0107}=2.05

z=2.05

4 0
3 years ago
{4x-2y+5z=6 <br> {3x+3y+8z=4 <br> {x-5y-3z=5
lesya692 [45]

There are three possible outcomes that you may encounter when working with these system of equations:


  •    one solution
  •    no solution
  •    infinite solutions

We are going to try and find values of x, y, and z that will satisfy all three equations at the same time. The following are the equations:

  1. 4x-2y+5z = 6
  2. 3x+3y+8z = 4
  3. x-5y-3z = 5

We are going to use elimination(or addition) method

Step 1: Choose to eliminate any one of the variables from any pair of equations.

In this case it looks like if we multiply the third equation by 4 and  subtracting it from equation 1, it will be fairly simple to eliminate the x term from the first and third equation.

So multiplying Left Hand Side(L.H.S) and Right Hand Side(R.H.S) of 3rd equation with 4 gives us a new equation 4.:

4. 4x-20y-12z = 20      

Subtracting eq. 4 from Eq. 1:

(L.HS) : 4x-2y+5z-(4x-20y-12z) = 18y+17z

(R.H.S) : 20 - 6 = 14

5. 18y+17z=14

Step 2:  Eliminate the SAME variable chosen in step 2 from any other pair of equations, creating a system of two equations and 2 unknowns.

Similarly if we multiply 3rd equation with 3 and then subtract it from eq. 2 we get:

(L.HS) : 3x+3y+8z-(3x-15y-9z) = 18y+17z

(R.H.S) : 4 - 15 = -11

6. 18y+17z = -11

Step 3:  Solve the remaining system of equations 6 and 5 found in step 2 and 1.

Now if we try to solve equations 5 and 6 for the variables y and z. Subtracting eq 6 from eq. 5 we get:

(L.HS) : 18y+17z-(18y+17z) = 0

(R.HS) : 14-(-11) = 25

0 = 25

which is false, hence no solution exists



3 0
2 years ago
Find the total surface area of this square based
MrRissso [65]

Answer:

300ft^2

Step-by-step explanation:

Total surface area = Area of base + (1/2) x perimeter of base x slant height

Area of base = length² = 10 x 10 = 100

Perimeter of base = 2 ( length + breadth)

2 x 20 = 40

slant height = 10

100 + (1/2) x 40 x 10 = 300 ft^2

7 0
3 years ago
The theory that it is reasonable to chose the simpler theory when choosing between two competing theories of equal explanatory v
Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

Occam’s razor theory.

Step-by-step explanation:

This theory is known as Occam’s razor theory.

It's a theory based on the principle whereby we give precedence to simplicity. It states that out of two competing theories, the one with the simpler explanation of an object should be embraced over the other. The reason is that the philosopher William of Ockham said that "objects are not meant to be multiplied beyond absolute necessity.”

This definition resonates with what is explained in the question.

Thus, the theory is as explained.

6 0
3 years ago
Which is greater 3% or 0.3
Degger [83]
They are both equal. 3% converted to a fraction is .3
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Reggie and Jay go on a walk every morning. Reggie walks 2 1/4 miles. Jay walks 1 3/8 miles less then Reggie. What is the total d
    14·1 answer
  • Inline skates are on sale for 35% off the regular price
    6·1 answer
  • Evaluate the expression 9 – 2 when z = 4.
    14·1 answer
  • Help!!!!!!!!!!!<br> Solve for x<br> x+11+8x=29<br> Explain how you got the answer please!
    14·2 answers
  • 3/7 is proper, improper, or mixed number
    12·2 answers
  • 1/2(4x+10)=2 i need to get x
    12·1 answer
  • Explain one way to add a 3-digit number
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me with my question!!
    9·2 answers
  • Can someone please help!!!
    7·1 answer
  • PLZZ HELP STUDYING FOR A TEST PLZZ!!!! THANK YOU
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!