1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stepladder [879]
3 years ago
11

The thickness of a plastic film (in mils) on a substrate material is thought to be influenced by the temperature at which the co

ating is applied. A completely randomized experiment is carried out. Eleven substrates are coated at 125F, resulting in a sample mean coating thickness of and a sample standard deviation of s1 5.08. Another 13 substrates are coated at 150F, for which and s2 20.15 are observed. It was originally suspected that raising the process temperature would reduce mean coating thickness. Do the data support this claim
Mathematics
1 answer:
statuscvo [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello!

The objective is to test if rising the process temperature reduces the thickness of the plastic film that coats a substrate material To do so, two samples of substrates are coated at different temperatures:

Sample 1

X₁: Thickness of the plastic film after the substrate is coated at 125F

n₁=11

X[bar]₁= 101.28

S₁= 5.08

Sample 2

X₂: Thickness of the plastic film after the substrate is coated at 150F

n₂= 13

X[bar]₂= 101.70

S₂= 20.15

Does the data support this claim? Use the P-value approach and assume that the two population standard deviations are not equal.

Now if the higher the heat, the thinner the thickness of the plastic coating, then the average thickness of the coating done at 150F should be less than the average thickness of the coating done at 125F, symbolically: μ₂ < μ₁

Then the hypotheses are:

H₀: μ₂ ≥ μ₁

H₁: μ₂ < μ₁

α:0.05 (there is no α level stated so I've chosen the most common one)

Assuming that both variables have a normal distribution since the population standard deviations are not equal, the statistic to use is the Welch's t-test:

t= \frac{(X[bar]_2-X[bar]_1)-(Mu_1-Mu_2)}{\sqrt{\frac{S^2_1}{n_1} +\frac{S^2_2}{n_2} } } ~~t_w

t_{H_0}= \frac{(101.7-101.28)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{(20.15)^2}{13} +\frac{(5.08)^2}{11} } } = 0.072

This test is one-tailed to the left, meaning that you'll reject the null hypothesis at small values of t. The p-value is also one-tailed and has the same direction as the test. To calculate it you have to first calculate the degrees of freedom of the Welch's t:

Df_w= \frac{(\frac{S^2_1}{n_1} +\frac{S^2_2}{n_2} )^2}{\frac{(\frac{S^2_1}{n_1})^2 }{n_1-1}+\frac{(\frac{S^2_2}{n_2} )^2}{n_2-1}  }

Df_w= \frac{(\frac{5.08^2}{11} +\frac{20.15^2}{13} )^2}{\frac{(\frac{5.08^2}{11})^2 }{10} +\frac{(\frac{20.15^2}{13} )^2}{12} } = 13.78

The distribution is a Student's t with 13 degrees of freedom, then you can calculate the p-value as:

P(t₁₃≤0.072)= 0.4718

Using the p-value approach, the decision rule is:

If the p-value ≤ α, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

If the p-value > α, the decision is to not reject the null hypothesis.

The p-value is greater than the significance level, so the decision is to nor reject the null hypothesis.

Using a significance level of 5%, there is no significant evidence to support the claim that the average thickness pf the plastic coat processed at 150F is less than the average thickness pf the plastic coat processed at 125F.

I hope you have a SUPER day!

You might be interested in
When a number is doubled, the result is 48. What is the number
ddd [48]
The number u looking for is 28
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Divide. <br> 3/5 \1/4<br><br> A. 3/20<br> B. 5/12<br> C. 4/9<br> D. 2 2/5
KIM [24]
Its letter A 3/20 i divided it


4 0
3 years ago
determine the point of intersection of the following pair of lines ............2x-3y-4=-13 and 5x=-2y+25. 3x+2y-7=0 and 2x=12-5y
grandymaker [24]

Answer:

  1. (x, y) = (3, 5)
  2. (x, y) = (1, 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

A nice graphing calculator app makes these trivially simple. (See the first two attachments.) It is available for phones, tablets, and as a web page.

__

The usual methods of solving a system of equations involve <em>elimination</em> or <em>substitution</em>.

There is another method that is relatively easy to use. It is a variation of "Cramer's Rule" and is fully equivalent to <em>elimination</em>. It makes use of a formula applied to the equation coefficients. The pattern of coefficients in the formula, and the formula itself are shown in the third attachment. I like this when the coefficient numbers are "too messy" for elimination or substitution to be used easily. It makes use of the equations in standard form.

_____

1. In standard form, your equations are ...

  • 2x -3y = -9
  • 5x +2y = 25

Then the solution is ...

  x=\dfrac{-3(25)-(2)(-9)}{-3(5)-(2)(2)}=\dfrac{-57}{-19}=3\\\\y=\dfrac{-9(5)-(25)(2)}{-19}=\dfrac{-95}{-19}=5\\\\(x,y)=(3,5)

__

2. In standard form, your equations are ...

  • 3x +2y = 7
  • 2x +5y = 12

Then the solution is ...

  x=\dfrac{2(12)-5(7)}{2(2)-5(3)}=\dfrac{-11}{-11}=1\\\\y=\dfrac{7(2)-12(3)}{-11}=\dfrac{-22}{-11}=2\\\\(x,y)=(1,2)

_____

<em>Note on Cramer's Rule</em>

The equation you will see for Cramer's Rule applied to a system of 2 equations in 2 unknowns will have the terms in numerator and denominator swapped: ec-bf, for example, instead of bf-ec. This effectively multiplies both numerator and denominator by -1, so has no effect on the result.

The reason for writing the formula in the fashion shown here is that it makes the pattern of multiplications and subtractions easier to remember. Often, you can do the math in your head. This is the method taught by "Vedic maths" and/or "Singapore math." Those teaching methods tend to place more emphasis on mental arithmetic than we do in the US.

7 0
3 years ago
8p + 2 + 10 + 3p = 67
OLga [1]

Answer:

I'm guessing the answer you are wanting is false

5 0
3 years ago
Describe the end behavior of the given function <br> f(x)=9x^3-x^2-8x+6<br>​
Mekhanik [1.2K]
As x approaches -inf f(x) -> -inf
and as x approaches inf, f(x) approaches +inf

Mark brainliest please
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Zhang thinks that the value of a baseball card can be modeled by exponential decay and that the value will decrease at a rate of
    7·2 answers
  • What is the value of p in the equation shown? <br> 3<br> p =-0.027
    5·1 answer
  • Vedant received two quotes for new carpet for his home. The quote from Company A is $0.15 less per square foot than the quote fr
    12·2 answers
  • How do you solve the system of y=x and x-4y=0
    14·1 answer
  • 1 Point
    8·2 answers
  • NEED HELP ASAP!!!! Okay, I have 5 proportional relationship questions, PLEASE HELP:
    11·1 answer
  • Find the measure of the indicated angle. Round to the nearest tenth.
    7·1 answer
  • If
    6·2 answers
  • Express 1764 as a product of their prime factors, giving your answer in index form. Hence evaluate √1764?
    12·1 answer
  • The equations y = 2x - 5 and y = 13.x
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!