Answer:
C. The actual variable overhead costs were lower than the budgeted costs.
Explanation:
Variable Overhead Cost variance =Budgeted cost - Actual Cost
where this value is positive, this is favorable, where this is negative it is unfavorable.
Actual cost = Actual hours X Actual rate per hour
Budgeted Cost = Budgeted hours for actual level of production X Budgeted rate per hour
Even if actual hours are lower than budgeted it will not lead to favorable overhead as actual rate per hour might be less.
Total variable overhead will only be favorable when net actual variable overhead cost is less than budgeted variable overhead costs.
C. The actual variable overhead costs were lower than the budgeted costs.
Answer:
d. Matt's statement is positive while Jean's statement is normative
Explanation:
A positive statement can be defined as any statement that is typically based on empirical evidence and as such can be tested, proven and verified. Also, a positive statement can be amended or rejected based on evidences that are available.
On the other hand, a normative statement can be defined as any statement that can't be tested, proven or verified because it is judgmental and based on opinions.
In this scenario, Matt observes that "there is a high correlation between educational attainment and the level of income." Jean concurs and adds that "high school graduates should all proceed to college"
Hence, Matt's statement is positive because it is an observation based on empirical evidence while Jean's statement is normative because it's simply his opinion or a value judgment.
The correct answer would be revenue budget approach. In this approach, a manager is asked to maximize the profit they get from the services and goods that are produced. Revenue budget is a forecast of the sales of a company. Managers would use certain model to maximize the amount of such.
<u>Solution and Explanation:</u>
The following formulas will be used in order to calculate the accounts receivable turnover ratio and in order to find out the number of days collect.
Accounts receivable turnover ratio = Net sales divided by Average net Accounts receivable
![=\$ 50,370 /[(\$ 7,250+\$ 5,720) / 2]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%5C%24%2050%2C370%20%2F%5B%28%5C%24%207%2C250%2B%5C%24%205%2C720%29%20%2F%202%5D)
= 7.77 times
<u>Days to collect</u> = 365 divided by Accounts receivable turnover ratio
= $365 divided by 7.77
= 47 days
<u>Note</u>: The number of days that has been assumed is 365 days
In the elastic portion of the demand curve.
