Answer:
Light-rail systems have been tried all over the country, and they've failed. The system the city proposes won't work, either. People enjoy their cars too much to endure inconvenience for the sake of the environment. And I don't blame them. As the owner of Jake's Used Cars and Trucks, I have seen the joy and freedom car ownership brings people. Americans will never abandon that feeling for the sake of being slightly better citizens. I believe it is far more responsible to purchase a high-quality car with good fuel efficiency. Building an entire light-rail system will be wasteful if few people use it — plus, it will take years to build and cost taxpayers millions of dollars. I encourage all city residents to vote against the light-rail system on May 1.
Explanation:
Answer:
Spain
Explanation:
Spain is in between France and Portugal. This can be checked on a World map.
The sensory, or afferent, division of the peripheral nervous system carries information from the brain and spinal cord to effector organs.
The nervous system is the command center of the body. Starting in your brain, it controls your movements, thoughts, and automatic reactions to the world around you.It also controls other body systems and processes, such as digestion, breathing, and development (adolescence). also, control.
The classical doctrine of the nervous system in biology is that the nervous system is a highly complex part of an animal that coordinates its behavior and sensory information by transmitting signals to and from various parts of the body. That's what it means.
The nervous system is a complex network of nerves and cells that carry messages to and from the brain and spinal cord to different parts of the body.
Learn more about the nervous system here
brainly.com/question/869589
#SPJ4
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
North Korea
China
USA
Canada
