1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Serga [27]
3 years ago
13

Any ideas about the 9-11

Law
2 answers:
romanna [79]3 years ago
6 0

During 9/11 planes were crashed into the twin towers, and another plane supposed to hit the white house ran into a field because the people on the plant figured it out. Later the black boxes on these planes were discovered with the last words of the people who passed on the plane. If you want more info on this is suggest watching the red bandanna documentary about 9/11.

leva [86]3 years ago
6 0

Today is a sad day because of the iniquitous people that caused 9-11

You might be interested in
9. Which of the following federal-level agencies would be responsible for transporting federal prisoners from a jail to a maximu
VladimirAG [237]
D it must be the Us marshals service
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following can review and, when necessary, overturn decisions made at the trial court level? statutory agencies arbi
aev [14]

Answer:

appellate courts

8 0
3 years ago
Which of these political stances would not align with the Democratic party
Ber [7]

Answer:

Girl what

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you drive an SUV or RV, you need to be worried about clearance when driving __________.
Scilla [17]
Under small bridge or anything that will pretty much hit the top of the car
4 0
3 years ago
What is Katz argument?<br><br> What is the Katz v United States holding ?
gregori [183]
What is Katz argument: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.




What is the Katz v United States holding: The Court ruled that Katz was entitled to Fourth Amendment protection for his conversations and that a physical intrusion into the area he occupied was unnecessary to bring the Amendment into play. "The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places," wrote Justice Potter Stewart for the Court.
3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • If the motor vehicle is not registered in Florida the vehicle operator is not required to properly secure children five years ol
    9·2 answers
  • Many U.S. cities are adopting ranked voting in municipal elections, where voters rank the candidates in order of
    7·2 answers
  • Why might jurors struggle to reach a verdict? (Include 3 reasons)
    10·2 answers
  • Write a two-page paper which analyzes your responsibilities in relation to
    6·1 answer
  • Whats the difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause?​
    11·1 answer
  • How are other countries doing when it comes to female representation in the police force compared to the US?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of an Authoritarian government?
    5·1 answer
  • Understanding a 'standard serving' allows you to compare
    5·1 answer
  • How is harvey birdman, attorney at law different from other legal shows?.
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the requirements to become a US citizen.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!