Answer:
The amount that would be reported as receivables from affiliates is $0.
Explanation:
Here Mr and Mrs Dart owns a majority of shares of Wall corp, Black co, and West inc. In 2010 , wall made advanced cash to black($50,000) and west($80,000) and also west made advance to black($70,000).
While preparing the combined balance sheet for all these company's , any amount of account receivables will not be included because preparing a combined balance sheet is same as making consolidated balance sheet , were any inter company profit or losses , account receivables and payable are not included in the balance sheet , so therefore the amount that would be reported as receivables from affiliates is $0.
If his starting balance is the $225.91
then his balance would be
-131.71
Answer:
the expected return on the portfolio is 12.34%
Explanation:
The computation of the expected return on the portfolio is shown below:
Expected Return is
= Investment in BBB × Return+ Investment in ZI × Return
= 16.4 × 48% + 8.6 ×52%
= 7.87% + 4.47%
= 12.34%
hence, the expected return on the portfolio is 12.34%
Answer:
Letter E is correct. <u>Product disapprobation.</u>
Explanation:
In this matter, we can say that the factor that probably dictated the adaptation of Greengens products in this scenario was the product's disapproval.
This failure of the chocolate company Greengens was due to some management error and analysis of the market in question. When entering an international market, the company must analyze a series of important variables for the product to be accepted by the local public, no matter how standardized the product is, there are some local characteristics that should not be disregarded, such as local values, culture , needs, tastes, etc., which means that an adaptation of a product or service is necessary for it to be actually accepted and consumed in a given country.
Answer:
A. moral hazard
Explanation:
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this scenario is perfectly exemplifying the term known as a moral hazard. This refers to when an individual takes more risks because someone else is bearing the costs. Such as in this scenario, Christopher is an employee and should be working on company tasks but instead works on his own projects because the company cannot check up on him, which is morally wrong and he can get fired for it.
