Subtract that number down so its a
The best explanation for why the rotation is isometric is "<u>The rectangle did not change shape or size</u>". Hence the <u>second option</u> is the right choice.
There are four main categories of transformations:
- Translation (figure slides in any direction)
- Reflection (figure flips over a line)
- Rotation (figure turns about a fixed point)
- Dilation (the figure is enlarged or reduced)
A stiff transformation known as an isometry maintains perimeter and area while also preserving length and angle measurements. In other words, there is congruence between the preimage and the image. Translations, reflections, and rotations are therefore isometric, but dilations are not since the image and preimage are comparable, rather than congruent figures.
The transformation in the question will be isometric when the preimage of the rectangle before 360° rotation, will be congruent to the image after the rotation.
The congruency is best described by the option "The rectangle did not change shape or size", as that is the basis of congruency.
Thus, the best explanation for why the rotation is isometric is "<u>The rectangle did not change shape or size</u>". Hence the <u>second option</u> is the right choice.
Learn more about isometric transformations at
brainly.com/question/24095450
#SPJ4
The provided question is incomplete. For the complete question, refer to the attachment.
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
This is <em>a separable differential equation</em>. Rearranging terms in the equation gives

Integration on both sides gives

where
is a constant of integration.
The steps for solving the integral on the right hand side are presented below.

Therefore,

Multiply both sides by 

By taking exponents, we obtain

Isolate
.

Since
when
, we obtain an initial condition
.
We can use it to find the numeric value of the constant
.
Substituting
for
and
in the equation gives

Therefore, the solution of the given differential equation is

Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on this information, you could conclude that the annual rainfall in Falls City is generally more than that of the annual rainfall in Rockaway Beach. This is based on the information provided since the numbers given are the mean annual rainfall. Meaning that this is the average amount of rain that falls in any given year in that specific location. Since the amount provided for Falls City is a larger number then it means it gets more rainfall than Rockaway Beach on average and would therefore be the safest conclusion that can be made.
Answer:
C x+3=1 is the answer to your question