2 years ago

Which term best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what u want to prove

1 answer:

8 0

Answer:

The Latin phrase is "reduction ad absurd um", meaning reduction to absurdity. You assume the opposite and show that logically it leads to a contradiction and therefore cannot be true.

Hope this helps.

You might be interested in

Gabe rounds 9.456 to the nearest hundredth. Then, he rounds the result to the nearest tenth. Last, he rounds that result to the

larisa86 [58]

Answer:

390

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

What are the first three terms of the sequence a1 = 3 and an = 2(an-1)^2? I thought the answer was 3,18,32 but that's not an opt

7nadin3 [17]

A1=3
a2=2(3^2)=18
a3=2(18^2)=648

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the value of x?

Helen [10]

They should be the same since it’s congruent ??

6 0

3 years ago

How do i do xy=4 <br> 2x-y+2=0 <br> i'm solving by substition

GarryVolchara [31]

so I think the answer is very difficult ask to someone else

Step-by-step explanation:

xy=4

2x-y+2=0

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Explain why the graph below does not represent a direct variation

Nitella [24]

Answer:

C. The line does not go through the origin.

Step-by-step explanation:

We have been given a straight line graph that doesn't pass through origin (0,0) and has y-intercept at (0,3).

Now we need to decide why that graph doesn't represent a direct variation.

We know that graph represents variation when it passes through origin. But since given graph doesn't passes through origin so it doesn't represent the direct variation.

Correct choice is :

<u>C. The line does not go through the origin.</u>

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which term best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what u want to prove​

Which term best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what u want to prove