The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice.
The differences of their salaries is that t<span>he bassoonists earn a higher salary than the flutists.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
Answer:
B. $16.67
Explanation:
The computation of the accrued interest expense is shown below:
= Notes receivable or Principal × rate of interest × number of days ÷ (total number of days in a year)
= $5,000 × 4% × (30 days ÷ 360 days)
= $16.67
We assume there are 360 days in a year
And, the 30 days is calculated from December 1 to December 31
This is the answer and same is not mentioned in the given options
Answer:
Discourage Torri from continuing. Encourage Julie to continue.
Explanation:
The progress of all trainees is tracked. Those not showing good progress are moved to less demanding programs. This means that there is hope of still doing/getting a job, if they don't pass this test.
REQUIREMENT: By the 10th time doing the test, trainees must be able to complete the task in a maximum of 1 hour.
1st Trainee: Torri Olson-Alves
5 hours on Unit 4; 4 hours on Unit 8
Should Torri be encouraged to continue? NO.
There are 10 units or repetitions in all. If Torri spends 5 hours on Unit 4 and spends 4 hours on Unit 8, then Torri is slow or isn't making much progress. After 4 repetitions, her marginal product only increased by an hour. She most likely won't make it to 1 hour by the 10th repetition.
2nd Trainee: Julie Burgmeier
4 hours on Unit 3; 3 hours on Unit 6
Should Julie be encouraged to continue? YES.
Julie makes a progress of 1 hour after 3 repetitions. We can predict that after another 3 repetitions (on Unit 9) progress would be made again and by Unit 10, she would have met the required benchmark.
Answer:
Arrange the investments in order from the highest risk and return potential to the lowest risk and return potential:
A. property
B. bonds
C. starting a business
D. mutual funds
Solution:
C. starting a business
A. property
D. mutual funds
B. bonds
Explanation:
Investments are the exchanges of income during one period for assets that are expected to earn income in future periods. It is the act of committing capital now in order to obtain future earnings. The risk and return calibration depends on one's personal circumstances and risk appetite.
Some investments offer higher returns with great growth potentials and higher risks while others offer lower returns with lower risks.
Starting a business has the highest risk and return potential. The risk is that you may not realise any return. However, if you are successful in the business, you can get the highest return ever.
Property investments either by building new property, buying built property, or investing in property investment fund may also yield so much returns but the risks are higher than other investments in this class. There is no guarantee that prices of property will not fall so dramatically that you sustain big losses. There is always need to insure your property against disasters like fire.
Mutual funds are professionally managed funds whereby money is pooled from different investors in order to buy stocks, bonds, etc. with long-term horizon. It has higher risk profile than investing in bonds as an individual, because you could recoup some returns in bonds as interests are paid periodically.
Bonds are debt securities to a government or business with the promise of repayment and period interests. They are generally risk-free investments with lower returns because of the guaranteed repayment.
Answer:
bundling a slow mover with a fast moving product.
Explanation:
One of the most effective ways in which a manufacturer or a retail store can get rid of slow movers (products with low sales level) is by bundling them with some fast moving product (products with high sales level). Usually slow movers are added as a promotion with a steep discount, but it is better to recoup some money than nothing.
When manufacturers bundle slow movers with a fast moving product they do this because the retailers need the fast moving product (high demand) or their sales will decrease. Video game retailers really want the games about the Survivor show and they will probably be willing to buy a small amount of no good War of the Worlds game in order to get them. They might also use the same sales strategy and bundle the War of the Worlds game with some other slow mover game and make a 2 for 1 sale.
