Answer: Politics in some parts of the colonies oscillated, and social movements that opposed slavery emerged.
Explanation:
It is essential to point out at the outset that the slave policy in the South and North was different. The south was entirely dependent on the slave labour, while in the north the slaves were in somewhat better conditions. However, when we talk about the north of More specifically New England, there were some oscillations in the colony. New England freed more and more slaves from year to year, primarily because of the fact that they were involved in the war. The colonial government in Rhode Island, which is an integral part of New England, sought to maintain a somewhat more rigid position on slaves, but all went towards freeing these people. Specific religious-social movements also emerged, which, by invoking moral principles, sought to eliminate slavery.
They wrote in the amendment clause into the original constitution allowing for constitutional amendments as long as they were approved by a 2/3 vote in both the Senate and House of Reps and wasn't declared unconstitutional by the Judaical or Executive branches. Also a amendment can not be erased from the constitution another amendment must be placed to void it. <span />
<span>B. They did away with feudalism however paid the ruling class, and changed the social classes.</span>
Many people did not agree with slavery in some states, which caused tension in many areas.
<span>From Cieza's perspective, the admirable qualities of this empire are the strong and organized system offers a good quality, he believes that the Inca peoples are well off and wealthy, and they had no clue if or when a take over could occur so they were always prepared with troops in the waiting.</span>
