If consumers and firms become less optimistic about the future economy then (C) unemployment will rise.
<h3>
What is unemployment?</h3>
- Unemployment is the state of being capable of working, actively seeking work, but unable to find any.
- It should be noted that in order to be considered unemployed, a person must be an active member of the labor force and actively seeking remunerative work.
- Unemployment reduces demand, consumption, and purchasing power, resulting in lower profits for businesses and budget cuts, and workforce reductions.
- It starts a vicious cycle that is difficult to break without outside intervention.
- Unemployment will rise if consumers and businesses become less optimistic about the future economy.
Therefore, if consumers and firms become less optimistic about the future economy then (C) unemployment will rise.
Know more about unemployment here:
brainly.com/question/305041
#SPJ4
The complete question is shown below:
1. Consider an economy at full employment. If consumers and firms become less optimistic about the future economy then
a) price levels will rise.
b) output will rise.
c) unemployment will rise.
Answer: True
Explanation: I dont have none
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": brand equity.
Explanation:
Brand equity is the value a company gains from its name recognition. To ensure customer loyalty the brand equity so valuable, companies must consistently produce quality products. This creates loyal customers who are willing to pay more for a preferred brand.
They can offer a certain amount of raise if they do extra work they can also motivate them with threatening to fire them they can also motivate them that they’ll get them something else and motivate them but if they don’t do this then they’ll get the amount of money they get lowered
1) Town of Bayport:
We have that the residents value the fireworks at
a total of 50+100+300=450$. That is the utility they gain. But they
would also have to pay 360$ for the fireworks. The total outcome is
450$+(-360$)=90$. Hence, the outcome is positive and the fireworks pass
the cost benefit analysis.
If the fireworks' cost is to be split
equally, we have that each of the 3 residents has to pay 360/3=120$. Let
us now do the cost-benefit analysis for everyone.
Jacques stands to gain 50$ from the fireworks but would have to pay 120$. He will vote against it.
Also, Kyoko will gain 100$ but would have to pay 120$. He will lose utility/money from this so he will vote against.
Musashi on the other hand, would gain 300$ and only pay 120$. He is largely benefitted by this measure. Only he would
We have that 2 out of the 3 would vote against the fireworks, so that the fireworks will not be bought. The vote does not yield the same answer as the benefit-cost analysis.
2) Town of River Heights:
We have that the total value of the fireworks to the community
is 20+140+160=320$. The total value of the fireworks is lower than
their cost so their cost benefit analysis yields that they should not be
bought.
However, let's see what each resident says. The cost to each resident is 360/3=120$. Rina is against the fireworks since she will only gain 20$. Sean and Yvette are for the fireworks since they gain 140$ and 160$ respectively, which are larger than the cost of the fireworks to each of them (120$). Hence, 2 will vote for the fireworks and one will vote against and fireworks will be bought.
Again, the vote clashes with the cost-benefit analysis.
3) The first choice is wrong. It is very difficult for a government to provide the exact types of public goods that everyone wants because that would be too costly; one cannot have a public good that everyone pays for so that only a couple of people enjoy it. In our example, we saw that in every case, a public good and its production would have sime supporters and some adversaries.
Majority rule is not always the most efficient way to decide public goods; as we have seen in the second case, the cost-benefit analysis yields that the fireworks are not worth it but they are approved by the majority nonetheless.
The final sentence is correct. The differing preferences of the people make a clearcut choice impossible and the government has to take into account various tradeoffs and compromises in order to determine which public goods to provide.
