Answer:
it afforded greater long-term security
Explanation:
<em> it offered more opportunities for job training </em>– this is not the correct answer. Slave apologists from the west didn’t care much for job training opportunities.
<em>it afforded greater long-term security</em> – <u>this is the correct answer. Southerners who apologized slavery thought slaves actually benefited from this way of life where someone offers them control</u>, plan for life, and structured job.<u> In their ideas, slaves would be lost, frightened, even irresponsible if they had freedom. By enslaving them, they believed they gave them security and stability.</u> This kind of life, they argued, is better than workers who had jobs and freedom in the North, as slaves had proper care and protection.
<em>it was actually a "freer" relationship</em> – this is not the correct answer. The southern apologists didn’t claim slaves were freer in this type of relationship, just that it was better for them.
<em>it included women in the workforce </em>– this is not the case. The problem of women's work rights was not mentioned at the time.
Answer:
Monotheism
Hope this helps, if it does give brainliest please
The USA wanted to prevent areas of the world falling under Communist influence. The Cold War was at its height in the late 1940s and early 1950s, when the French appealed to the USA for aid. The US government saw Vietnam as another Korea.
The immediate effect was an outpouring of grief and indignation of a kind rarely if ever experienced in the United States. The emotional impact of the crime was heightened by the fact that it occurred almost immediately after the Civil War had ended. The long-term effect was that the goal of the country's well-being changed. Lincoln's plan was simply to reunite the country not really focused on slaves. Without him, the plan shifted a bit. Hope this helped :))
