0.5
Explanation:
Given parameters:
Mass of Ca²⁺ = 10g
unknown:
Equivalent weight = ?
Solution:
Equivalent weight that is the amount of electrons which a substance gains or loses per mole.
Ca²⁺ has +3 charge
It lost 2e⁻;
therefore;
In 1 mole of Ca²⁺, we have 2 equivalent weight
1 mol Ca²⁺ = 2eq. wts.
1 mol Ca x (40 g / 1 mol ) x (1 mol / 2 eq.wts.) = 20.0 g = 1 eq.wt.
Therefore;
10.0 g Ca²⁺ x (1 eq.wt. / 20.0 g) = 0.5 eq.wts.
learn more:
Molar mass brainly.com/question/2861244
#learnwithBrainly
B and D is out. It cant be A because heat of combustion is substance not compound. So the answer is D.
It would be MnSO4
The (II) lets you know it’s the form with a 2+ charge and Sulfate has a 2- charge
These will cancel out making it plain MnSO4
If it was manganese (iii) sulfide the answer would be Mn2(SO4)3
Answer:
The weights of all elements are always compared to the Carbon-12.
Explanation:
The weights of all elements are always compared to the Carbon-12 because the mass of carbon is 12 which is the exactly the sum of protons and neutrons.
Oxygen was also considered the standard for some time but later this stander was rejected because in natural O¹⁷ and O¹⁸ were also present and this create the two different atomic mass tables.
AMU:
Atomic mass unit is define as the 1/12 the mass of an atom of carbon-12.
C12 has six neutron and six protons in the nucleus.
This unit is used to express the masses of atoms. We know that masses of atoms are very small and we do not have any such type of balance that can measure very small quantity. So that is way we use this scale to measure small quantity. For example, according to this scale
relative atomic mass of hydrogen is 1.008 amu
relative atomic mass of oxygen is 15.999 amu
relative atomic mass of uranium is 238.0289 amu
relative atomic mass of chlorine is 35.453 amu
Answer:
This atomic model has changed over time. Scientists used the model to make predictions. Sometimes the results of their experiments were a surprise and they did not fit with the existing model. Scientists changed the model so that it could explain the new evidence.
Explanation:
