Answer:
the marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost
Explanation:
In response to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the government decided to allocate more resources toward defense goods. The government's decision reflects their assessment that t<u>he marginal benefit of defense goods outweighs the marginal cost.</u>
In utility in economics, once the marginal benefits of buying an item outweighs the marginal cost of the item, you buy it. After the September 11, 2001 attack, the United States government found a need to increase the defense budget to prevent further attack. It can be concluded that the marginal benefit derived from increased defense spending outweighs the cost.
Things happen as part of the natural order, so the situation will eventually correct itself.
The theological stage is the beginning period of a general public's advancement, as indicated by Comte. At the beginning of the general public, the individuals come up short on the capacity to respond to their significant inquiries regarding the world utilizing down to earth or logical methods.
Accordingly, they concoct folklores that clarify natural marvels using gods or powerful elements. Comte separates the philosophical stage into three particular periods.
They made up a semi-reasonable story to explain why something is the way it is today.
Egyptians gained wealth and land through heredity. They inherit the wealth and land that the previous generation accumulated and use the wealth and land to acquire some more. That would be another way, buying. More or less, it is not just the lands and wealth that are bought but the people that owned these. They are bought out for their service, buying their freedom to serve a more powerful being. Thus, acquiring their wealth and land and adding it unto their own. Another one is through conquering. There are small groups at places that are rich in wealth and land. When a man in power finds this, it is easily conquered and the wealth and land would also be acquired adding it to their own. Another one would be through discovery. Wealth or land with no ownership would result to a first-come-first-serve basis. When the first man owns it, it is up to him how to defend it from people who want the same thing. In the society, the royalty or the Pharaoh would be the wealthiest and the one with the most lands through the ways mentioned above.
I vehemently oppose the idea that protecting natural rights is beyond the power of the government. Our military exists for the sole purpose of protecting natural rights; life, liberty, and property. It is the governments who think they are being operated by God that are notorious for failing to defend natural rights, rather they are the most flagrant offenders in regards to denying the natural rights of the people.