Answer:
C) i and ii
Explanation:
Price elastic of demand (PED) of kerosene = 2.2% / 10% = 0.22 price inelastic demand
When two products are substitutes, an increase in the price of one of the products will not only reduce the quantity demanded of that product, but it will also increase the quantity demanded of its substitute products. In this case, an increase in the price of electricity, increases the quantity demanded for kerosene, which means that they are both substitute products.
Answer:
business activities in India
<h3>1) Manufacturing - </h3>
- When product is manufacture or made to that it cn be sold in Market
<h3> </h3><h3>2) storage - </h3>
- After the product is ready it required some space to store until it would sold in the market
<h3>3) transporting</h3>
- as per the demand it will transport from one place to another
<h3>4) financing - </h3>
- It requires some money to meet the expense before solding a product
<h3>5) marketing</h3>
- to let people know about the product so that more products will be sold
There are other activities also such as managing, accounting etc
Answer:
B) Increases profits by $700.
Explanation:
We must perform an incremental analysis of the costs and revenues generated by the alternative course of action which is offering the package:
Current income:
ballroom rent $4,500
<u>extras $800</u>
total current income = $5,300
Alternative action income:
wedding package $6,000
opportunity cost ballroom rent $4,500
<u>opportunity cost extras $800 </u>
net income increase = $700
Answer:
Piper should report $308,000 as net income for the year . Option C
Explanation:
Accumulated Depreciation till 2014 = [$600,000×(5+4+3)] ÷ 15 = $ 480,000
Book Value at beginning 2015 = $600,000 - $480,000 = $120,000
Depreciation Expense in 2015 = $120,000 ÷ 2 = $60,000
Net Income before depreciation & taxes = $ 500,000
Depreciation = $ 60,000
Electronic Benefits Transfer = Net Income before depreciation & taxes - Depreciation
= $ 500,000 - $ 60,000
=$ 440000
Tax Expenses = $440,000 × 30% = $132,000
Net Income =$ 308,000
Answer: Justin's sponsoring broker
Explanation:
From the question, we are informed that Justin, a real estate salesperson with City Brokerage, received a referral fee when he refered a client to Mark, who is another real estate salesperson with City Brokerage.
The person to pay Justin his referral fee will be Justin's sponsoring broker. It should be noted that when another agents gets a referral from an agent, the sponsoring broker is the one who gives the referral fee to the referring agent.
