I think the answer is the supreme court.
You can choose a price that <u>maximizes your profits</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
If you are the only clothes producer in the industry, it is known as monopoly. Monopoly means a single seller selling a unique product without competition.
The monopoly seller has the right to choose the price for his goods. He can fix the price in the way to maximize his profit. As he is the sole seller, he will not have any competitions in the industry. This in turn helps him to make lot of profit on producing clothes with full freedom in fixing the price of the clothes.
Many business owners and financial officers consider leasing an effective strategy offering flexibility, convenience and control for managing finances that provides immediate cash-flow benefits, simplifies equipment upgrades, may bring significant tax advantages, and helps achieve short- and long-term company goals.
The connection between Great Britain and its North American Colonies started to hint at strain in the mid 1700s. Until at that point, England's distraction with common clash and progressing war with France enabled the Colonies to bear on local and remote exchange with little obstruction from British specialists. Likewise, since their establishing, the Colonies had been overseeing their very own significant number undertakings. The Colonists, therefore, built up a feeling of autonomy. At the point when England started authorizing limitations on Colonial exchange and taking different activities that proposed Colonists did not have an indistinguishable rights from British residents in England, the Colonists started to check out their own character and question Great Britain's power over them.
Starting in 1764, the British government passed a progression of acts intended to attest its power and raise income from the Colonies. The Colonists accepted, in any case, that demanding duties was a privilege saved for their agent Colonial governing bodies. At the point when the Colonists' restriction to the Stamp Act affected its annulment, they utilized comparative intends to contradict the Townshend Acts, this time boycotting British merchandise and pestering traditions authorities.
