Answer:
the second bag
Step-by-step explanation:
to find it u have to think of it as fractions. 3/20 has to equal ?/500 so divide 500 by 20 and you get 25. then multiply the 3 by 25 which equals 75. so it would be 75/500 which is less than 170/500
Answer:
4.5%
Step-by-step explanation:
800(1-0.01)=\color{green}{792}
800(1−0.01)=792
6180(1-0.05)=\color{blue}{5871}
6180(1−0.05)=5871
Last Year This Year
Stock A 800 792
Stock B 6180 5871
Total 6980 6663
\text{Find overall decrease:}
Find overall decrease:
6980(1-r)=6663
6980(1−r)=6663
\frac{6980(1-r)}{6980}=\frac{6663}{6980}
6980
6980(1−r)
=
6980
6663
1-r=0.954585
1−r=0.954585
-r=-0.045415
−r=−0.045415
Subtract 1
r=0.045415
r=0.045415
Divide by -1
\text{Final Answer: }4.5\%
Final Answer: 4.5%
Multiply by 100 and round to nearest 10th
Answer:
mon 50.75
tue 47.25
wed 36.05
thur 54.25
fri 36.75
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm not 100% sure if that's right
Answer:
you have to find the smallest common denominator
Step-by-step explanation:
so once the fractions have the same denominator you can add them easily and simplify
Answer:
z(s) is in the rejection region. We reject H₀. We dont have enought evidence to support that the cream has effect over the recovery time
Step-by-step explanation:
Sample information:
Size n = 100
mean x = 28,5
Population information
μ₀ = 30
Standard deviation σ = 8
Test Hypothesis
Null Hypothesis H₀ x = μ₀
Alternative Hypothesis Hₐ x < μ₀
We assume CI = 95 % then α = 5 % α = 0,05
As the alternative hypothesis suggest we should develop a one tail-test on the left ( we need to find out if the cream have any effect on the rash), effects on the rash could be measured as days of recovery
A z(c) for 0,05 from z-table is: z(c) = - 1,64
z(s) = ( x - μ₀ ) / σ/√n
z(s) = ( 28,5 - 30 ) / 8/√100
z(s) = - 1,5 * 10 / 8
z(s) = - 1,875
Comparing z(s) and z(c)
|z(s)| < |z(c)| 1,875 > 1,64
z(s) is in the rejection region. We reject H₀. We dont have enought evidence to support that the cream has effect over the recovery time
