Answer:
Answer down below.
Explanation:
The ration system was indeed useful for the times. Since meats and other hearty foods were sent to the soldiers out on war, I think that rationing was the best way to keep the citizens alive. It also kept the soldiers at war healthy and fed, ready for battle.
Answer:
The two-state solution to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict envisions an independent State of Palestine alongside the State of Israel, west of the Jordan River. ... The territory of the former Mandate Palestine (including Jerusalem) which did not form part of the Palestinian State would continue to be part of Israel.
You could argue that they were very similar because of the connection between religion and state. The states had leaders but the leaders all ultimately answered to religious leaders even though they were kingdoms on their own. The difference was that the Islamic Caliphates had leaders that were also the leaders of the religious world, while the leaders in European Kingdoms answered to people like the Pope who was a religious leader regardless of the kingdom.
Answer:
A) They believed the American colonists were incapable of cooperating in their own defense.
Explanation:
Options:
A. They believed the American colonists were incapable of cooperating in their own defense.
B. Native American tribes were sure to side with the French over the British.
C. The colonists protested against the deployment of British troops in North America.
D. The king insisted that the colonies were not generating enough income to support a war.
As a result of Britain's humiliation, the potential for French intervention and a European war became more and more likely. North's administration, concerned about a war with France, wanted to mend relations with the American colonies and was willing to allow them some autonomy to that end in 1775. However, by 1778, the autonomy granted to the colonies had become insufficient.
Wasn't it the Fugitive slave act?
