Ok this inequality tells you the number of devices you can have before the new plan costs more than the old plan. The new plan expression is $4.50x + $94m = y ( total cost). The old plan is $175m = y (total cost). You can see m (number of months) in both equations, you don't need it this time since we're going to to compare both to one month. Since they're both equal to y you can make them equal to each other. $4.50x + $94 = $175. Now you want to figure when the new plan is less than the old plan you switch the equal sign for a less than sign. $4.50x + $94 < $175; this will help you find the inequality you want. From there just use algebraic steps to find that x has to less than 18 or
x < 18.
Answer and Step-by-step explanation:
You are correct in that we need to use the Law of Sines: 
.
Here, when we use the Law of Sines, we have: 
.
Cross multiply:
(sinB) * 28 = (sin63) * 29
28sinB ≈ 25.839
sinB ≈ 0.9228
Now, in order to solve for B, we need to use inverse sin (
):
The sines on the left cancel out, and we're left with:
B ≈ 67.3 degrees
Now, one thing to keep in mind when doing Law of Sines is that there is potentially more than one answer possible for the degree measure. The other degree measure can be found by subtracting this one from 180:
180 - 67.3 = 112.7 degrees.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Tổng 3 góc trong 1 tam giác là 180 độ
Vậy góc B = 180 - A - C = 180 - 90 - 50 = 40 độ
Based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
<h3 /><h3>What is congruency?</h3>
The Side-Angle-Side Congruence Theorem (SAS) defines two triangles to be congruent to each other if the included angle and two sides of one is congruent to the included angle and corresponding two sides of the other triangle.
An included angle is found between two sides that are under consideration.
See image attached below that demonstrates two triangles that are congruent by the SAS Congruence Theorem.
Thus, two triangles having two pairs of corresponding sides and one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent to each other is not enough justification for proving that the two triangles are congruent based on the SAS Congruence Theorem.
The one pair of corresponding angles that are congruent MUST be "INCLUDED ANGLES".
Therefore, based on the SAS congruence criterion, the statement that best describes Angie's statement is:
Two triangles having two pairs of congruent sides and a pair of congruent angles do not necessarily meet the SAS congruence criterion, therefore Angie is incorrect.
Learn more about congruency at
brainly.com/question/14418374
#SPJ1
Answer:
∫₀² ln(x²) dx
Step-by-step explanation:
An integral is an improper integral if one or both endpoints is infinity, if the function is undefined at one or both endpoints, or if the function is discontinuous between the endpoints.
ln(x²) is undefined at x = 0.
