Answer:
Bill is also equally and somewhere more liable as he is the employer.
Explanation:
Although in records it might seem that George did the falsify act, but for that he required the permission of his employer.
When the fact is clearly stated that George did this on direction of his employer Bill, and that Bill demanded this intentionally in order to present extra profits, he is more liable for this false act.
As George is the employee, he is bound to follow the directions of his employer. Thus Bill is crucially liable for this act, as he is an important reason for this act.
Answer:
wages decrease
Explanation:
Labor is a factor of production and has a price like all other inputs. In the economy, labor is a commodity whose price is determined by the forces of demand and supply. When there is an oversupply of labor, its equilibrium price will decrease.
The equilibrium price of labor is the prevailing wage rate, where demand matches supply. When immigration adds to the labor force, it means an additional supply of able and willing workers in the markets. There will be many sellers or workers offering to supply labor services to the existing job openings. As a result, the price of labor will reduce as buyers or employers can lower the wage rate and still get the labor services they require.
Answer:
The answer is "Whenever a court requires him to use the res ipsa loquitur doctrine, he possibly would succeed".
Explanation:
Res ipsa loquitur is also an English common law doctrine which claims in an action for tort, throughout the absence of direct proof on whether any defendant acted, a jury may conclude neglect of the nature of an illness or incident. It is used in circumstances in which the complainant is not presented sufficient proof that the offender is not liable.
